TUMULTUOUS UNIVOCITY: BADIOU’S MISREADING OF BEING AND THE EVENT IN DELEUZE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70832/EVENTanditsMediation.10Keywords:
being, Body without Organs, difference, event, univocityAbstract
Badiou argues that Deleuze fails to liberate the concept of difference by re-inscribing the multiple into the totality of the One. This suppression of difference is supposedly carried out at the expense of the radical uniqueness of the event, which, according to Badiou, has no immediate connection to being. I investigate how Badiou reaches this conclusion and then establish his interpretation of being and the event. For Badiou, being is a void; therefore, the event is a radical beginning or rupture entirely disconnected from being. Deleuze, on the contrary, maintains a deep connection between being and the event. Furthermore, he claims that being is univocal — said with one singular voice — even though it is always spoken with an endless number of diverse tones and timbres. Hence, for Deleuze, the event is a repetition of being, a clamorous oscillation between the repetition of the same and of difference. Next, I demonstrate how Badiou’s interpretation of Deleuze goes awry. While Badiou rightly describes Deleuze’s account of being as univocal, he misconceives Deleuze’s concepts of being and the event that are at once singular and multiple. Because the event simultaneously expresses singularity and multiplicity, the difference separating them is never sterilized or suppressed. Instead, it is through this very difference that they are produced and merge into one ontological plane. Deleuze’s concept of the Body without Organs allows for these different forces to occupy the same surface without silencing the clamour of being. The Body without Organs is irreparably cracked, though still one substance. Its two sides or attributes are held together through an irresolvable tension. Nonetheless, the different layers of being share the same lens. Therefore, Deleuze’s concept of being is not a repetition of the same that levels down difference but a repetition of the event that continually produces it anew.
References
Aristotle, “Metaphysics.” In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by Richard McKeon, 689–934. New York: Random House, 2001.
Badiou, Alain. Deleuze: The Clamour of Being. Translated by Louise Burchill. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
Badiou, Alain. Logic of Worlds: Being and Event II. Translated by Alberto Toscano. London: Continuum, 2009.
Badiou, Alain. Being and Event. Translated by Oliver Feltham. London: Continuum, 2012.
Barnes, Jonathan. “Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, edited by Jonathan Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Bartlett, A. J., Justin Clemens, and Jon Roffe. Lacan, Deleuze, Badiou. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2015.
Deleuze, Gilles. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. Translated by Robert Hurley. San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1988.
Deleuze, Gilles. Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza. Translated by Martin Joughin. New York: Zone Books, 1990.
Deleuze, Gilles. Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature. Translated by Constantin V. Boundas. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.
Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition. Translated by Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
Deleuze, Gilles. Negotiations: 1972–1990. Translated by Martin Joughin. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
Deleuze, Gilles. The Logic of Sense. Translated by Mark Lester. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia II. Translated by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, [1987] 2020.
Derrida, Jacques. Rogues: Two Essays on Reason. Translated by Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Nass. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.
Greenstine, Abraham Jacob. “Diverging Ways: On the Trajectories of Ontology in Parmenides, Aristotle, and Deleuze.” In Contemporary Encounters with Ancient Metaphysics, edited by Ryan J. Johnson, 202–223. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.
Lapoujade, David. Aberrant Movements: The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. Translated by Joshua David Jordan. South Pasadena: Semiotext(e), 2017.
Roffe, Jon. Badiou’s Deleuze. New York: Routledge, 2012.
Scotus, John Duns. “Lectura 1, d.” In The Basic Quidditative Metaphysics of Duns Scotus as Seen in His Primo Principio, edited by R. P. Prentice. Rome: Antonianum, 1970.
Scotus, John Duns. Philosophical Writings: A Selection. Edited and translated by Allan Wolter. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1987.
Smith, Daniel W. “From the Surface to the Depths: On the Transition from Logic of Sense to Anti-Oedipus.” In A Deleuzian Century?, edited by Ian Buchanan, 82–97. Durham: Duke University Press, 1999.
Świątkowski, Piotrek. Deleuze and Desire: Analysis of The Logic of Sense. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2015.
Widder, Nathan. “The Univocity of Substance and the Formal Distinction of Attributes: the Role of Duns Scotus in Deleuze’s Reading of Spinoza.” Parrhesia 33 (2020): 150–176.
Žižek, Slavoj. Organs without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences. New York: Routledge, 2004.
