THE FUNDAMENTAL COMPETENCE OF THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE – ROOM FOR DISPUTES OR EFFECTIVE CO-OPERATION

Authors

  • Tóthová Veronika University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik in Košice Faculty of Law Department of Criminal Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32978/sjp.2023.009

Keywords:

European Public Prosecutor’s Office, European Prosecutor, competence, regulation, investigation, co-operation

Abstract

In the article, the author deals with the institute of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, the reasons for its creation and the existing structure. It lists the various fundamental powers of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and defines its competence under the Regulation. She points out the facts how the adoption of the Regulation on the European Public Prosecutor’s Office affected the national regulation in member states. Last but not least, the author points to the issue of exercising the powers of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in the individual participating states that are signatories to the Regulation, but also points to the issue of exercising the powers of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office between non-participating states and third countries that are not even members of the European Union.

References

W. L. BACHMAIER: Cross-Border Investigations Under the EPPO Proceedings and the Quest for Balance. In: The European Public Prosecutor’s Office: The Challenges Ahead. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2018, 125.

N. BRACK – R. COMAN – A. CRESPY: Sovereignty conflicts in the European Union. Les Cahiers du Cevipol 2019/4 (N° 4), 3–30. https://www.cairn.info/revue-les-cahiersdu-cevipol-2019-4-page-3.htm.

M. DELMAS-MARTY – J. A. E. VERVAELE: Corpus Juris 2000: Criminal law for the protection of financial interests of the European Union (European Prosecutor). Iura Edition, Bratislava, 2003. AUC Iuridica 1/2006, 37.

M. DESETT – E. SZABOVÁ: Perspectives of European Public Prosecutor´s Office. p. 424, EQUILIBRIA, s. r. o.

H-H. HERRNFELD: Implementation of the EPPO Regulation: A Perspective from Germany. In: K. LIGETI – M. J. ANTUNES – F. GIUFFRIDA (eds.): The European

Public Prosecutor’s Office at Launch: Adapting National Systems, Transforming EU Criminal Law. Wolters Kluwer Italia, Milano, 2020, 149–162.

E. INOTAI – T. GOLSING – E. SZEKERES – C. CIOBANU: Democracy digest: Hungary and Poland refuse to join EU justice league. Reporting Democracy

https://balkaninsight.com/2021/06/04/democracy-digest-hungary-andpoland-refuse-to-join-eu-justiceleague.

J. JELINEK: The future of the European Public Prosecutor´s Office. In the collection of scientific contributions of the nationwide interdisciplinary scientific conference with an international participation: 1st Košice days of criminal law, p. 424, EQUILIBRIA, s. r. o.

R. KERT: Specific Aspects of the Implemantation of the EPPO Regulation in Austria. In: K. LIGETI – M. J. ANTUNES – F. GIUFFRIDA (eds.): The European Public Prosecutor’s Office at Launch: Adapting National Systems, Transforming EU Criminal Law. Wolters Kluwer Italia, Milano, 2020, 137–148.

V. MITSILEGAS – F. GIUFFRIDA: The European Public Prosecutor’s Office and human rights. In: W. GEELHOED et al. (eds.): Shifting perspectives on the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. Springer, Berlin, 2018, 59–98.

A. ONDREJOVÁ: European Public Prosecutor’s Office – structure and competence. Advocacy Bulletin Vol. 3, 2018, 31.

A. ONDREJOVÁ: European Public Prosecutors Office – new entity, new questions, part 1: Scope of public prosecution surveillance – power to conduct

investigations and other measures. Advocacy Bulletin Vol. 4, 2018, 6.

A. ONDREJOVÁ: European Public Prosecutor’s Office – new entity, new questions, part 2: European Public Prosecutor’s Office and cross-border competence. Advocacy Bulletin Vol. 5, 2018, 26.

S. PAWELEC: Implications of Enhanced Cooperation for the EPPO Model and Its Functioning. The European Public Prosecutor’s Office: An Exteded arm, or two headed Dragon? Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2015.

UDVARHELYI B.: Az Office-tól a College-ig – Gondolatok az Európai Ügyészség szervezeti felépítéséről. Ügyészek Lapja, 2021/1., 147–166.

Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation for the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office.

Working Arragement published on Documents | European Public Prosecutor’s Office (europa.eu)

Annual report EPPO, see EPPO_Annual_Report_2021 (1).pdf

Slovakia. Act no. 153/2001 Coll. on the Prosecutor’s Office.

Slovakia. Act no. 154/2001 Coll. on prosecutors and prosecutor trainees.

Slovakia. Act no. 301/2005 Coll. Code of Criminal Procedure.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-16

How to Cite

Tóthová, V. (2023). THE FUNDAMENTAL COMPETENCE OF THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE – ROOM FOR DISPUTES OR EFFECTIVE CO-OPERATION. Publicationes Universitatis Miskolcinensis Sectio Juridica Et Politica, 41(1.), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.32978/sjp.2023.009

Issue

Section

STUDIES IN THE FIELD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE