Thoughts on the criminal liability of companies from a labour perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32978/sjp.2025.006Keywords:
liability, criminal law, companies, sustainability, regulationAbstract
Liability is key to society’s self-correction. In recent years, we may now say decades, and especially recently, numerous reports, research and forecasts have warned that humanity is heading in the wrong direction and that urgent change is needed. Companies have a particularly significant impact on the achievement of sustainability, with influence extending to the environmental, economic and social pillars. The paper touches on the issue of corporate
criminal liability, focusing in particular on how the current legal framework can be strengthened to achieve sustainability goals, for example through the regulation of supply chains. The aim of the paper is to provide food for thought to further consider the legal and moral aspects of corporate liability in the context of sustainability.
References
BARTA Judit – BARZÓ Tímea – CSÁK Csilla (eds.): Magyarázat a kártérítési jogról. Wolters Kluwer Kft., Budapest, 2018.
Theodore BAURER: Love Canal: Common law approaches to a modern tragedy. Environmental Law 11 (1), 1980, 133–160. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/43265529, 11 February 2025
Clouds of Injustice – Bhopal Disaster 20 Years On. Amnesty International. https://theconversation.com/bhopal-after-40-years-ongoing-effects-of-worlds-worst-industrial-disaster-show-environmental-racism-is-alive-and-well-245287, 10 February 2025.
COM(2022) 732 final – Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52022PC0732.
Consolidated text: Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA.
Corporate sustainability due diligence. European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/doing-business-eu/sustainability-due
-diligence-responsible-business/corporate-sustainability-due-diligence_en, 13 February 2025.
Corporate sustainability reporting. European Commission. https://finance.ec.europa.eu/capital-markets-union-and-financial-markets/company-reportingand-
auditing/company-reporting/corporate-sustainability-reporting_en, 13 February 2025.
CSÉCSY Andrea – FÉZER Tamás – HAVASI Péter – TÓTH Endre Tamás – VARGA Nelli: A kártérítési jog magyarázata. Complex Kiadó Kft., Budapest, 2010.
CSEMÁNÉ VÁRADI Erika – GÖRGÉNYI Ilona – GULA József – HORVÁTH Tibor – JACSÓ Judit – LÉVAY Miklós – SÁNTHA Ferenc: Magyar büntetőjog – általános rész. Wolters Kluwer Kft., Budapest, 2017.
Deepwater Horizon – BP Gulf of America Oil Spill. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/deepwater-horizon-bp-gulf-america-oil-spill, 10 February 2025.
Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its
victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA.
Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting.
Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859.
EÖRSI Gyula: Kártérítés jogellenes magatartásért. Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó, Budapest, 1958.
EÖRSI Gyula: Kötelmi jog. Általános rész. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest, 2003.
EÖRSI Gyula: Tézisek a polgári jogi felelősségről. Állam- és Jogtudomány 1976/2. 185–207.
FANTOLY Zsanett: A jogi személyek büntetőjogi felelősségének megítélése az Európai Unióban. http://jesz.ajk.elte.hu/fantoly8.html
FÖLDESI Tamás: Jog, erkölcs, gazdaság. Iskolakultúra – Természettudomány, Az Országos Közoktatási Intézet folyóirata IV, 1994/18., 2–11.
Gesetz über die unternehmerischen Sorgfaltspflichten zur Vermeidung von Menschenrechtsverletzungen in Lieferketten https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/lksg/, 13 February 2025.
Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. United Nations, 2011, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf, 13 February 2025.
KOMPORDAY-OROSZ Noémi: A büntetőjog és polgári jog kárfogalma – azonos terminológia, eltérő definíciók. Ügyészek Lapja 2021/1–2., 35–54.
Living Planet Report 2024 – A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, Switzerland, 2024.
MISKOLCZI BODNÁR Péter: Az erkölcs és a jog szoros kapcsolata. Polgári Szemle 2015/4–6., 27–33.
Diana OTLEWSKI: The Incubation of Environmental Disasters: Case Study of the Rana Plaza collapse. Major Paper, Master of Environmental Studies, Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, Bangladesh, 2014.
POLT Péter – PALLAGI Anikó – SCHUBAUER László: Büntetőjog a gyakorlatban. Dialóg Campus, Budapest, 2020.
Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims – Outcome of the European Parliament’s first reading (Strasbourg, 22 to 25 April 2024). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CONSIL:ST_9241_2024_INIT.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).
Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and
amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act)
SÁNTHA Ferenc: A gazdasági társaságok, egyéb szervezetek felelőssége a nemzetközi büntetőjogban. Miskolci Jogi Szemle XVII, 2022/5., 127–137.
SÁNTHA Ferenc: A jogi személyek büntetőjogi felelőssége. KJK-KERSZÖV Jogi és Üzleti Kiadó Kft., Budapest, 2002.
SÁNTHA Ferenc: A szervezetek büntethetőségének elméleti kérdései a magyar büntetőjogban: büntetőjogi felelősség vagy büntetőjogi szankcionálhatóság.
In: Wiener A. Imre Ünnepi Kötet. KJK-KERSZÖV Jogi és Üzleti Kiadó Kft., Budapest, 2005, 99–109.
Summary of Criminal Prosecutions - United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://cfpub.epa.gov/compliance/criminal_prosecution/index.cfm?action=3&prosecution_summary_id=2468, 10 February 2025.
Supply Chain Act. https://www.csr-in-deutschland.de/EN/Business-Human-Rights/Supply-Chain-Act/supply-chain-act.html, 13 February 2025.
Yasmin VAN DAMME – Gert VERMEULEN: Towards an EU Strategy to Combat Trafficking and Labor Exploitation in the Supply Chain. Connecting Corporate Criminal Liability and State-Imposed Self-Regulation Through Due Diligence? In: Regulating Corporate Criminal Liability. (ed.: Dominik BRODOWSKI – Manuel ESPINOZA DE LOS MONTEROS DE LA PARRA – Klaus TIEDEMANN – Joachim VOGEL) Springer Cham, 2014, 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05993-8_15
