Overcoming Regional Disparities in Serbia through Regional Innovation Systems at the NUTS II Level

Valentina Ivanič

doi:10.32976/stratfuz.2023.23

Szerzők

Valentina Ivanič Közgazdasági Intézet, Belgrád

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32976/stratfuz.2023.23

Kulcsszavak:

regional disparities, regional system of innovation, culture, Serbia

Absztrakt

The objective of this research is to reveal and understand the strengths and weaknesses of the two groups of regional innovation systems in Serbia – those operating in Belgrade and Vojvodina region, with strong administrative capacity, and those operating in Šumadija and Western Serbia and Southern and Eastern Serbia, operating without administrative capacity at the regional level. Data were collected from existing databases, and interviews with members of the focus groups. The action research methodology was used also. The findings show that regions without administrative capacity have RDAs with cooperative culture, more externally oriented, and more devoted to building eonomic software and economic orgware axis instead of the regions with administrative capacity. The mature RIS is present in the regions without administrative power in Serbia (Šumadija and Western Serbia, Southern and Eastern Serbia) in comparison to two NUTS II regions (Belgrade and Vojvodina region)

Információk a szerzőről

Valentina Ivanič, Közgazdasági Intézet, Belgrád

Ph.D., tudományos munkatárs

Hivatkozások

Amin, A. (2004): An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. Reading economic geography. pp 48-58.

Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005): Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8) pp. 1173–1190. https://10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013

Bachtler, J., & Yuill, D. (2001): Policies and strategies for regional development: A shift in paradigm. Regional and Industrial Policy Reserach Paper, No 46. pp 1-46.

Bartlett, W., Krasniqi, B., & Ahmetbašić, J. (2019): Attracting FDI to the Western Balkans: Special Economic Zones and Smart Specialisation Strategies. Croatian Economic Survey, 21(2), 5-35. https://10.15179/ces.21.2.1

Benzi, M., Ocskay, G. (2021) The evolution of cross-border cooperation in Hungary. Észak-magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek XVIII pp. 54-66

Benner, M. (2019): Smart specialization and institutional context: the role of institutional discovery, change and leapfrogging. European Planning Studies, No. 27(9), pp. 1791-1818. https://10.1080/09654313.2019.1643826

Benz, A., & Eberlein, B. (1999): The Europeanization of regional policies: patterns of multilevel governance. Journal of European Public Policy, No. 6(2), pp. 329-348. https://10.1080/135017699343748

Bertolini, N. (2023): Smart cities. (V. Ivanic, Interviewer), Belgrade.

Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1999): The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation. Oxford University Press.

Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997): Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy No. (4–5), pp. 475–491. https://10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5

Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1998): Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. Environment and planning. No. 30(9), pp. 1563-1584.

Donatiello, D., & Ramella, F. (2017): The Innovation Paradox in Southern Europe. Unexpected

Performance During the Economic Crisis. South European Society and Politics, 22(2), pp. 157-177. https://10.1080/13608746.2017.1327339

Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Labini, M. S. (2006): The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’. Research policy, 35(10), pp. 1450-1464.

EC. (2014): Screening report Serbia Chapter 18 - Statistics.

EC. (2021): EIS 2022 - RIS 2021.

EC. (2022): COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Serbia 2022 Report.

EC. (2022): European innovation scoreboard 2022.

Eriksen, S. (2006): Promoting Good Governance in Eastern Europe-Domestic Responses to External Influences. U D. Coombes, & L. Vass (Ed.), Foreign and Local Perspectives, pp. 227-255 Ljubljana.

Eriksen, S. (2007): „Institution Building in Central and Eastern Europe: Foreign Influences and Domestic Responses“. Review of Central and East European Law (32), pp. 333-369. https://10.1163/092598807X195232

Fitjar, R., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2022): Innovating in the Periphery: Firms, Values and Innovation in Soutwest Norway. European Planning Studies, 19(4), pp. 555-574. https://10.1080/09654313.2011.548467

Focus, Group. (2022): Uloga strategije pametne specijalizacije u razvoju Nomenklature statističkih teritorijalnih jedinica (NSTJ 2) regiona u Republici Srbiji. (V. Ivanic, Interviewer). Novi Sad.

Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2011): Smart specialisation From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. Political Science, pp. 1-16.

Foray, D., Morgan, K., & Radosevic, S. (2020): The Role of Smart Specialization in the EU Research and Innovation Landscape.

Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2011): Determinants of the Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems. Regional Studies, No. 45(7). pp. 905-918.

https://10.1080/00343400802251494

Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Pucheta-Martínez, M. (2021): Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and R&D intensity as an innovation strategy: a view from different institutional contexts. Eurasian Bus Rev. No. 11, pp. 191-220. https://10.1007/s40821-020-00168-4

Government of the Republic of Serbia. (2020): Smart Specialization Strategy of the Republic of Serbia for the period 2020 to 2027. "Official Gazzete RS" no. 21/2020.

Halkier, H., Danson, M., & Damborg, C. (1998): Regional Development Agencies in Europe. Political Science, Economics; European Urban and Regional Studies. https://10.4324/9781315000206-1

Hall, R. (2014): The Development of Regional Policy in the Process of European integration: An Overview. U G. Bischof, Regional Economic Development Compared: EU-Europe and the American South. Innsbruck university press: Innsbruck university press.

Herranz, N., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2013): The end of the “European Paradox”. Scientometrics, No. 95, pp. 453-464.

Hofstede, G. (2001): Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Tilburg University, Netherlands: SAGE Publishing.

Hofstede, G. (2001): Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2005): Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hudec, O. (2007) Regional innovation strategy as a policy instrument. North Hungarian Development Strategies Volume IV, Issue 2; pp. 3-13

Ivanic, V. (2020): Managing the cultural distance between Serbia and China: Doing business in Serbia from cultural due diligence perspeciteve. Novi Sad: Cultural Due Diligence Institute. ISBN – 978-86-902202-0-5.

Ivanić, V. (2010): Uloga i značaj poslovnih inkubatora za privredni razvoj Vojvodine. U B. Paunović, M. Du Pont, M. Dobrilović, V. Šenk, V. Ivanić, & D. Vukov, Strategija razvoja poslovnih inkubatora u AP Vojvodini u periodu 2011-2015. godine (pp. 1-92). Novi Sad: Centar za strateške ekonomska istraživanja "Vojvodina-CESS".

Ivanić, V. (2017): Organizaciona kultura kao činilac konkurentnosti preduzeća u tranzicionim uslovima. Beograd: Institut ekonomskih nauka.

Ivanić, V. (2020): Kako premostiti kulturnu distancu između Evropske unije i Jugoistočne Evrope. Beograd: Institut za evropske studije.

Keating, M. (2000): The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Edward Elgar. https://10.5860/choice.36-2995

Kocziszky, G. (2007): Measurement methodology of regional innovation potential. North Hungarian Development Strategies Volume IV, Issue 2; pp. 14-34

Lehmann, T., Benner, M., & Kapo, A. (2022): Institutional asymmetries in a low-coordination economy: the smart specialization paradox in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. https://10.1080/13511610.2022.2092075

Muscio, A., Reid, A., & Rivera Leon, L. (2015): An empirical test of the regional innovation paradox: can smart specialisation overcome the paradox in Central and Eastern Europe? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18(2), pp. 153-171.

North, D. C. (1991): Instiutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, No. 5(1). pp. 97-112.

Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., & Morgan, K. (2002): The regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, No. 27.pp. 97-110. https:///10.1023/A:1013104805703

Paunovic, B., & Ivanic, V. (2018): Napredovanje u lancima vrednosti u tranzicionim ekonomijama. Ekonomika preduzeća, 7-8. pp. 386-400.

https:///10.5937/EKOPRE1808386P

Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2006): Local and Regional Development. London: Routledge. https://10.4324/9780203003060

Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2007): What Kind of Local and Regional Development and for Whom? Regional Studies, pp. 1253-1269. https:///10.1080/00343400701543355

Potocnik, J. (2009): Prospects for science, technology and innovation. Selected papers from Research Commisioner Janez Potočnik s Expert Group, pp. 1-73.

Radonjic, Lj. (2022): Serbian Innovation Capacities from a Regional Perspective. Public Policy Reserach Centre. Belgrade.

Radosevic, S. (2002): Regional Innovation Systems in Central and Eastern Europe: Determinants, Organizers and Alignments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, pp. 87–96. https:///10.1023/A:1013152721632

Radosevic, S., & Ciampi Stančova, K. (2018): Internationalising Smart Specialisation: Assessment and Issues in the Case of EU New Member States. Journal of the Knowledge Economy No. 9. pp. 263-293. https://10.1007/S13132-015-0339-3

Ranga, M. (2018): Smart specialization as a strategy to develop early-stage regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies, No. 26(11). pp. 2125-2146. https://10.1080/09654313.2018.1530149

Razvojna agencija Srbije. (2022): Program standardizovanog seta usluga za mikro, mala i srednja preduzeća i preduzetnike u 2022. godini koji se realizuje preko akreditovnaih regionalnih razvojnih agencija. Beograd.

Rodica, P. (2021): The role of smart specialization in regional development. pp. 18-24. Chișinău.

Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013): Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, No. 47. pp. 1034-1047. https://10.1080/00343404.2012.748978

Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Di Cataldo, M. (2015): Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography. No. 15. pp. 673-706.

SARRA. (2022): Company profile. Belgrade.

Sasaki, I., & Yoshikawa, K. (2014): Going beyond national cultures–Dynamic interaction between intra-national, regional, and organizational realities. Journal of World Business, No. 49(3). pp. 455-464.

Scutairu, A. (2015): Landmarks in the evolution of regional science. The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, No 15(1). pp. 114-119.

Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia: (2018). Research and development (R&D) - Metada. Belgrade.

Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia: (2020.): Administrative territorial division and NSTJ levels 1, 2, 3. Belgrade.

Sweeney, G. (1995): National innovation policy or a regional innovation culture. Working Papers in European Industrial Policy.

Švarc, J., Lažnjak, J., & Dabić, M. (2019): Regional innovation culture in innovation laggard: A case of Croatia. Technology in Society, No. 58. https://10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.006

Uvalić, M., & Bartlett, W. (2021): Regional disparities and regional development policies in Serbia. Belgrade: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Office in Belgrade.

Vázquez Barquero, A. (1998): POLÍTICA ECONÓMICA LOCAL Y DESARROLLO ENDÓGENO. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe - CEPAL.

Warnke, P., at all. (2016): Opening up the innovation system framework towards new actors and institutions. Fraunhofer ISI.