The list of phone numbers and the paradox of representation. Reflections on resilience in a cross-border contex
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32976/stratfuz.2023.36%20Kulcsszavak:
CBC, pandemic, paradox of representation, EGTC, participatory governanceAbsztrakt
The COVID-19 pandemic has generated unharmonised measures on behalf of the national governments without communicating with the local actors of the border areas, the representatives of the existing cross-border structures included. Against the conclusions of several studies discussing the topic, the author claims that, notwithstanding a few exceptions, the cross-border structures established so far all over Europe were not involved in the management of the extreme situation. Instead, these were the interpersonal contacts of border citizens and informal channels through which derogations of strict measures were achieved at the regional and national governments. The author finds the reason of this phenomenon in the ‘paradox of representation’ meaning the controversial procedure through which border areas gradually obtain the legal entity status but they lose their societal basis. To illustrate this procedure, the study refers to three communities of experts of network governance, and, through their theoretical models, it arguments that in parallel with the institutionalisation of crossborder cooperation, its participative aspects gradually weaken. The COVID-19 pandemic clearly showed in practice, how this process stabilised the territorial representation status of the cross-border structures while it emptied the participative platforms of the citizens therein.
Hivatkozások
ALBERS, T.-KÖBELE-ENNAJI, V.-ROSS, J.-WOLFART, V. (2021): Quand les mécanismes de la coopération sont mis à l'épreuve. L'épidémie du Covid-19 et la fermeture de la frontière franco-allemande au printemps 2020 comme stress test pour la coopération transfrontalière. Paris: École nationale de l'administration.
ALLMENDINGER, P.-HAUGHTON, G.-KNIELING, J.-OTHENGRAFEN F. (2015): Soft spaces, planning and emerging practices of territorial governance. In: Soft Spaces in Europe. Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders. (eds. Allmendinger, P.- Haughton, G.-Knieling, J.-Othengrafen F.) London-New York: Routledge, 3-22.
ANSELL, C.-TORFING, J. (2016): Introduction: Theories of governance. In: Handbook on Theories of Governance. (eds. Ansell C.-Torfing, J.) Cheltenham, UK-Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1-17.
BEVIR, M. (2013): A Theory of Governance. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.
BEYLIER, P-A. (2020): The Swiss-French Border Closure During COVID-19: A Cross-border Worker's View. Borders in Globalization Review, 1. 25-28.
BJÖRK, P. G.-JOHANSSON, H. S. H. (1999): Towards governance theory: In search for a common ground. http://finans.regeringen.se/ [Accessed: 23.03.2020]
BÖHM, H. (2020): Researching cross-border cooperation under the shadow of COVID 19 pandemic: scientific report from e-conferences and blog-reflections produced between 14 March and 21 June 2020. Border and Regional Studies, 2. 81-86.
BUKO, S. (2020): Chronicles of the Living Borders: shared urban space of Gorizia (IT) and Nova Gorica (SLO). In: Bordering in Pandemic Times: Insights into the COVID-19 Lockdown. (eds. Wille, Ch.-Kanesu, R.) Luxembourg: UniGR-Center for Border Studies, 53-56.
CARRERA, S.-LUK, N. C. (2020): In the Name of COVID-19: An Assessment of the Schengen Internal Border Controls and Travel Restrictions in the EU. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/659506/IPOL_STU(2020)659506_EN.pdf [Accessed: 12.06.2021]
CESCI (2021): A koronavírus hatásai a határrezsimre. Értékelő elemzés a magyarországi határrezsim változásáról 2020 márciusa és 2021 augusztusa közt. Budapest: CESCI. https://legalaccess.cesci-net.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/JOGa5_Covidtanulmany_CESCI.pdf [Accessed: 03.09.2022]
CHHOTRAY, V.-STOKER, G. (2009): Introduction. In: Governance Theory and Practice. A Cross-Disciplinary Approach. (eds. Chhotray, V.-Stoker, G.) London-New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-15.
COATLEVEN, L.-HUBLET, F.-ROSPARS, R. (2020): Subsidiary Crisis Management in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Germany's Federalist Experiment in Transborder Perspective. Paris: Groupe d'études géopolitiques - Program for Central Europe.
COE (2021): Democratic Governance and COVID-19. Report. CDDG (2020)20. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
DAVOUDI, S.-EVANS, N.-GOVERNA, F.-SANTANGELO, M. (2008): Territorial Governance in the Making. Approaches, Methodologies, Practicies. Boletin de la A.G.E., 46. 33-52. http://www.age-geografia.es/ojs/index.php/bage/article/viewFile/677/631 [Accessed: 27.05.2020]
DE TOCQUEVILLE, A. (2002): Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DIENER, A. C.-HAGEN, J. (2012): Borders. A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
DURAND F. (2014): Challenges of Cross-Border Spatial Planning in the Metropolitan Regions of Luxembourg and Lille. Planning Practice and Research, 2. 113-132.
EC (2021): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. A strategy towards a fully functioning and resilient Schengen area. COM(2021) 277 final. Brussels: European Commission.
ECA (2022): Free movement in the EU during the COVID-19 pandemic. Limited scrutiny of internal border controls, and uncoordinated actions by Member States. Special report. Brussels: European Court of Auditors.
ENGL, A. (2016): Bridging borders through institution-building: the EGTC as a facilitator of institutional integration in cross-border regions. Regional & Federal Studies, 2. 143-169.
FELLNER, M. A. (2020): "What's Home Gotta Do With It?" Reflections on Homing, Bordering, and Social Distancing in COVID-19 Times. In: Bordering in Pandemic Times: Insights into the COVID-19 Lockdown. (eds. Wille, Ch.-Kanesu, R.) Luxembourg: UniGR-Center for Border Studies, 89-94.
GIACOMETTI, A.-MEIJER, W. M. (2021): Closed borders and divided communities: status report and lessons from Covid-19 in cross-border areas. Nordregio Report, 2021:6.
HENNIG, A. (2021): The spatial dimension of coronavirus crisis management and the role of subnational actors in the German–Polish border region. European Societies, 23(Sup1). S859-S871.
HOOGHE, L.-MARKS, G.: Types of Multi-Level Governance. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 11. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=302786 [Accessed: 14.03.2018]
HOROBETS, N.-SHABAN, T. (2020): Ukrainian Cross-Border Governance since the Beginning of COVID-19. Borders in Globalization Review, 1. 62-65.
KLATT, M. (2020): What has happened to our cross-border regions? Corona, Unfamiliarity and transnational borderlander activism in the Danish-German border region. In: Bordering in Pandemic Times: Insights into the COVID-19 Lockdown. (eds. Wille, Ch.- Kanesu, R.) Luxembourg: UniGR-Center for Border Studies, 43-48.
LANGE, E.-PIRES, I. (2018): The Role and Rise of European Cross-Border Entities. In: European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impacts of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe. (ed. Medeiros, E.) Cham: Springer, 135-149.
LEVI-FAUR, D. (2014): From „big government” to „big governance”? In: The Oxford Handbook of Governance. (ed. Levi-Faur, D.) Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press, 3-18.
LISSANDRELLO, E. (2004): Cross-border region Espace Mont-Blanc. A territorial ‘not-yet’? In: Cross-Border Governance in the European Union. (eds. Kramsch, O.-Hooper, B.) Abingdon-New York: Routledge, 88-103.
MARKS, G. (1993): Structural Policy and Multilevel Governance in the EC. In: The State of the European Community. (eds. Cafruny, A.-Rosenthal, G.) New York: Lynne Rienner, 391-410.
MEDEIROS, E.-GUILLERMO-RAMÍREZ, M. -OCSKAY, GY.-PEYRONY, J. (2021): Covidfencing effects on cross-border deterritorialism: the case of Europe. European Planning Studies, 5. 962-982.
MEDVE-BÁLINT, G. (2013): Incentives and Obstacles to Cross-Border Cooperation in Post-Communist Central Europe. In: Europe’s Changing Geography. The Impact of Inter-regional Networks. (eds. Bellini, N.-Hilpert, U.) London: Routledge, 44-70.
MEDVE-BÁLINT, G.-SVENSSON, S. (2012): Why Do Local Governments Join (Or Not Join) Euroregions? In: The Practicing of Borders between Public Policy and Everyday Life in Europe. (eds. Andersen, D.-Klatt, M.-Sandberg, M.) Farnham: Ashgate, 219-243.
OPIŁOWSKA, E. (2021): The Covid-19 crisis: the end of a borderless Europe? European Societies, 23(Sup1). S589-S600.
PETERS, G. B. (2014): Governance as political theory. In: The Oxford Handbook of Governance. (ed. Levi-Faur, D.) Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 19-32.
PEYRONY, J.-RUBIO, J.-VIAGGI, R. (2021): The effects of COVID-19 induced border closures on cross-border regions. An empirical report covering the period March to June 2020. Paris-Brussels: Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière – European Union. https://cor.europa.eu/en/engage/studies/Documents/The%20effects%20of%20COVID19%20induced%20border%20closures%20on%20cross-border%20regions/COVID19%20induced%20border.pdf [Accessed: 06.05.2021]
POPESCU, G. (2012): Bordering and Ordering the Twenty-first Century. Understanding Borders. Lanham-Boulder-New York-Toronto-Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC.
PROVAN, K. G.-KENIS, P. N. (2008): Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2. 229-252.
RADIL, M. S.-PINOS, C. J.-PTAK, T. (2021): Borders resurgent: towards a post-Covid-19 global border regime? Space and Polity, 1. 132-140.
SCOTT, J. W. (2004): The Northern Dimension. ‘Multiscalar’ regionalism in an enlarging European Union. In: Cross-Border Governance in the European Union. (eds. Kramsch, O.-Hooper, B.) Abingdon-New York: Routledge, 135-156.
SOMLYÓDYNÉ PFEIL, E. (2019): Territorial Governance and the Role of Institutions in Development Policy – About Conditions of Functional Space Construction from Unitary State Perspective. Tér – Gazdaság – Ember, 4. 9-28.
SVENSSON, S. (2013): Social Capital and Governance in European Borderlands: A comparative study of Euroregions as policy actors. Phd Thesis. Budapest: Central European University Doctoral School of Political Science, Public Policy and International Relations.
TELLE, S. (2017): Euroregions as soft spaces: between consolidation and transformation. European Spatial Research and Policy, 2. 93-110.
ULRICH, P. (2016): Participatory governance in the Europe of the (cross-border) Regions. The example of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC). L’Europe en Formation, 1. 156-179.
ULRICH, P. (2021): Participatory Governance in the Europe of Cross-Border Regions. Cooperation – Boundaries – Civil Society. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
UNFRIED, M. (2020): The closure of the border as a b-solution. Non-coordination of measures at the Dutch, Belgian and German border. In: Bordering in Pandemic Times: Insights into the COVID-19 Lockdown. (eds. Wille, Ch.-Kanesu, R.) Luxembourg: UniGR-Center for Border Studies, 49-52.
VEGGELAND, N. (2004): Post-national governance and transboundary regionalization. Spatial partnership formations as democratic exit, loyalty and voice options? In: Cross-Border Governance in the European Union. (eds. Kramsch, O.-Hooper, B.) Abingdon-New York: Routledge, 157-170.
VIRTANEN, P. (2004): Euregios in changing Europe. Euregio Karelia and Euroregion Pomerania as examples. (eds. Kramsch, O.-Hooper, B.) Abingdon-New York: Routledge, 121-134.
WEBER, F. (2022): Cross-border cooperation in the border region of Germany, France, and Luxembourg in times of Covid-19. European Societies, 3. 354-381.
WILLE, CH. (2020): Border(ing)s in Times of COVID-19. In: Bordering in Pandemic Times: Insights into the COVID-19 Lockdown. (eds. Wille, Ch.-Kanesu, R.) Luxembourg: UniGR-Center for Border Studies, 11-16.
ZUMBUSCH, K.-SCHERER, R. (2015): Cross-Border Governance: Balancing Formalized and Less Formalized Co-Operations. Soc. Sci, 4. 499-519.
##submission.downloads##
Megjelent
Hogyan kell idézni
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gyula Ocskay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
