Unlocking Potential of Social Capital in the Border Regions
Kulcsszavak:
regional disparities, social capital, cross borderAbsztrakt
Whilst the lagging regions may consider regional inequalities as a proof of regional unfairness, the well developed and successful might view the less developed regions as obstructing them in their movement to prospering. The differences aggravate often the social tensions based on ethnic, cultural, geographical, linguistic or religious differences, what is one of reasons to mitigate regional disparities. The mechanisms of regional convergence and divergence are well described, although there exist several other factors such as national factor of regional dependence or border factor that work as obstacles to spatial spillovers.
In a light of the recent theoretical research, regional growth depends on a number of external and internal qualitative attributes, formal and informal institutions, regional innovation system, knowledge base, social capital, innovation governance, etc. The attributes can be summarised for both regions by defining problem areas and Regional innovation system deficiencies based on (Tödtling, Trippl 2004, Cooke 2004, Asheim et al. 2007). Both regions show mixed characteristics of both old industrial (OIR) and peripheral regions (PR).
The border, national effect and lock–in factors are studied on the example of two border regions of Northern Hungary and Eastern Slovakia. Both of them are border regions, including the Schengen border with the Ukraine. In a comparison to quickly growing metropolitan regions of Budapest and Bratislava, raising regional disparities between the capitals and the north/eastern parts of the countries are typical after unlocking the regional potential in the open economic space of European Union.
From the economic point of view, both regions show up similarities such as heavy industry heritage, peripheral position to their metropolitan regions, similar level of regional GDP,similar degree of rurality – it means an expectation of the same problems and assumption of cross-border understanding. On the other side, the historical, cultural, political, legal conditions of trans-boundary activities make the development process of potential consistent economic space rather complex. The analysis of the circumstances, based on empirical study (interviews, focus groups) with a greater focus on Košice region, is giving several important answers about the existing social capital, regional cooperation, attitudes of the stakeholders, potential and ideasin the cross-border context of Northern Hungary and Eastern Slovakia.
Hivatkozások
Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Cooke, P., (2007). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, Utrecht University.
BARTA, G., FEKETE, É., KUKORELLI I., TIMÁR, J. (eds.): (2005). Hungarian spaces and places: patterns of transition. Centre for Regional Studies, Pécs.
BOSCHMA, R. (2003). An evolutionary approach to the restructuring of old industrial regions in Europe, paper presented at the International Workshop The Restructuring of Old Industrial Areas in Europe and Asia, Bonn.
CHARLES, D., NAUWELAERS, C., MOUTON, B. AND BRADLEY, D. (2000). Assessment of the Regional Innovation and Technology Transfer Strategies and Infrastructures (RITTS) Scheme, CEC, Luxembourg EUROSTAT News Release, Regional GDP per inhabitant in the EU27. 23/2007 - 19 February 2007.
COOKE, P. (2004). Introduction: Regional innovation systems – an evolutionary approach. In P. Cooke, M Heidenreich; H.J. Braczyk (Eds.), Regional Innovation Systems – the role of governance in a globalized world.1-18. London: Routledge.
FRUNZARU, V. (2005). Cross-border co-operation against social exclusion. In: Region co-operation as Central European perspective. Proceedings of the 1st DRC Summer School, Pécs 2004. Pecs: ECREI, 2005. pp. 74 – 83.
GÁL, Z. – RÁCZ, Sz.(eds.) (2008). Socio-Economic Analysis of the Carpathian Area. Ccentre for regional studies of Hungarian academy of sciences. Pécs.
HAMM, R. and WIENERT, H. (1989). Strukturelle Anpassung altindustrieller Regionen im internationalen Vergleich, Essen: RWI.
HASSINK, R. and SHIN, D-H. (2005). Guest editorial: the restructuring of old industrial areas in Europe an Asia, Environment and Planning A, 37.
HUDEC, O., KOĽVEKOVÁ, G. (2007). Learning regions, innovations and universities, In J. Kern, J. Malinovský, J. Sucháček: Theory of Learning regions and its utilisation in Regional Programming, pp. 142-168, Ostrava.
HUDEC O., URBANČÍKOVÁ N. (2007). Spatial disparities based on Innovation and Human Capital. In M. Jenks, D. Kozak and P. Takkanon: ’World Cities’ and Urban Form. Taylor & Francis Books.
HUDEC O. (2008). Eastern Slovakia and North-Eastern Hungary – future of their cross-border economic cooperation. Working Paper. Human Development Report, Slovakia and Hungary.
INNO-Policy TrendChart – Innovation Policy Progress Report HUNGARY (2009). European Commission.
INNO-Policy TrendChart – Innovation Policy Progress Report SLOVAKIA (2009). European Commission.
LORENTZEN A., WIDMAIER B., LAKI M.: (eds) (1999). Institutional Change and Industrial Development in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by. Aldershot: Ashgate.
LUNDVALL, B-Å. (ed.). (1992). National Systems of Innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, Pinter, London.
LUX, G. (2010). Central europe’s industrial spaces: path-dependent upgrading or radical restructuring? RSA conference “Regional responses and global shifts”, Pécs, Hungary.
MCDERMOTT, G. A. (2002). Embedded Politics: Industrial Networks and Institutional Change in Postcommunism. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
MEZEI, I. (2005): Hungarian and Slovakian cross-border relations. In: Barta, Gy. – G. Fekete, É.. –SzörényinéKukorelli, I. – Timár J. (eds.): Hungarian Spaces and Places: Patterns of Transition. Pécs, Centre for Regional Studies. pp. 544–563.
ORSOLYA Á. O. (2010). The economic impacts of the cross-border cooperation between Hungary and Slovakia. Budapest Business School, Budapest.
TÖDTLING, F. TRIPPL M. (2004). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated policy approach with respect to regional innovation systems
ZSÚGYEL, J. (2006). The economic and social situation of the region of Northern Hungary in the context of European integration. In: European integration studies. (volume 5, number 1). Miskolc: Miskolc University Press.
Regional Innovation Scoreboard: diversity across Europe. (2010). European Commission, Joint Research Centre.
##submission.downloads##
Megjelent
Hogyan kell idézni
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
