Regional innovation networks from two perspectives – innovation as an essence of local development (The Case of Slovak region)
Kulcsszavak:
innovation, regional, Slovak, local developmentAbsztrakt
Diversity of human knowledge which can be considered as a precondition of technological change leads to more or less economic development. The role of space could not be ignored and it is necessary to understand why networks of innovative actors can have a local dimension which is stronger or weaker in the sense of economic geography and economics of knowledge. The paper uses social network analysis to create networks of innovative actors – one for innovators and one for inventors. The main aim of applying mentioned concepts is to recognize actors that can be considered as carriers of knowledge and to identify differences among them. Calculated characteristics of networks suggest that in the case of Košice region, the bulk of knowledge can be found on the inventor´s side.
Hivatkozások
AGNEW, John A. (2013): Arguing with Regions. Regional Studies (47) 1. pp. 6-17.
AMIN, A.-THRIFT, N. (1994): Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 15-45.
ANTONELLI, C. (2006): The business governance of localized knowledge: an information economics approach for the economics of knowledge. Industry and Innovation 13. pp. 227-261.
BARRO, Robert J. - SALA-I-MARTIN, X. (2004): Economic Growth. Second Edition. Massachusets Institute of Technology. 320 s.
BAYCAN, T.-STOUGH, ROGER. R. (2012): Bridging knowledge to commercialization: the good, the bad, and the challenging. The Annals of Regional Science, Springer. pp. 36-54.
BOSCHMA, R. (2005): Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39. pp. 61-74.
CAMAGNI, R. - CAPELLO,R. (2009): Knowledge-Based Economy and Knowledge Creation: The Role of Space. Growth and Innovation of Competitive Regions – The Role of Internal and External Connections. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 145-165.
CAPPELLIN, R. (2004): International knowledge and innovation networks for European integration, cohesion and enlargement. Excellence in social science. UNESCO, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., UK. pp. 207-225.
CENTROPE_TT (2010): The CENTROPE R&D Cooperation Network. A Social Network Analysis. In cooperation with CENVELOP cooperative knowledge design gmbh. 21 s.
DEBRESSON, Ch. (1999): An Etrepreneur cannot Innovate Alone: Networks of Enterprises are required. Paper presented at DRUID, Aalbor, Denmark.
DOLOREUX, D. (2002): What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society 24. pp. 243-263.
DOLOREUX, D. - PARTO, S. (2005): Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society 27. pp. 133-153.
DOSI, G.-WINTER, Sidney G. (2000): Interpreting Economic Change: Evolution, Structures and Games. Working Paper Series.
FISCHER, Manfred M. (2000): Innovation, Knowledge Creation and Systems of Innovation. The Annals of Regional Science. 24 s.
FORNAHL, D.-BRENNER, T. (2003): Cooperation, Networks and Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. pp. 213-376.
FRITSCH, M.-GRAF, H. (2012): How sub-national conditions affect regional innovation systems: The case of the two Germanys. Papers in Regional Science (90) 2. pp. 331-353.
GREENHALGH, C. A.-ROGERS, M. (2006): The values of innovation: the interaction of competition, R&D and IP. Research Policy 35. pp. 56-80.
HARRISON, J. (2013): Configuring the New „Regional World“: On being Caught Between Territory and Networks. Regional Studies (47) 1. pp. 55-74.
HILPERT, U. (1992): Archipelago Europe – Islands of Innovation. Synthesis Report. Prospective Dossier Number 1: „Science, Technology and Social and Economis Cohesion in the Community“. Commission of the European Communities, Brusels.
JENSEN, M. B.-JOHNSON, B.-LORENZ, E.-LUNDVALL, B. A. (2007): Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36. pp. 680-693.
KLINE, Stephen J.-ROSENBERG, N. (1986): The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. 300 s.
LUNDQUIST, K.-J.-TRIPPL, M. (2013): Distance, Proximity and Types of Cross-border Innovation Systems: A conceptual Analysis. Regional Studies (47) 3. pp. 450-460.
MULDER, P.-VAN DEN BERGH, Jeroen C. J. M. (2001): Evolutionary Ecoomic Theories of Sustainable Development. Growth and Change 32. pp. 110-134.
NELSON, R. R.-WINTER, S. (1977): In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy 6. pp. 36-76.
NELSON, R. (2007): Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory. Working Paper Series, no. 2007-02. pp. 1-25.
ROMER, Paul M. (1986): Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. The Journal of Political Economy (94) 5. pp. 1002-1037.
SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. (1939): Business Cycles. Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process [online]. New York Toronto London: McGraw-Hill Book Company. 174 s. Availale:<http://docenti.lett.unisi.it/files/115/17/2/1/BusinessCycles_Fels.pdf>
SOLOW, Robert, M. (1956): A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (70) 1. pp. 65-94.
TODARO, Michael P.-SMITH, Stehphen, C. (2011): Economic Development. 11th Edition. (The Pearson Series in Economics). 834 s.
TORRE, A.-GILLY, J.-P. (2000): On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics. Regional Studies 34. pp. 169-180.
WASSERMAN, S.-FAUST, K. (1994): Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. 180 s.
##submission.downloads##
Megjelent
Hogyan kell idézni
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
