Tudományos és Technológiai Parkok osztályozásának összefüggései
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32976/stratfuz.2025.5Kulcsszavak:
tudományos park, technológiai park, innovációs ökoszisztéma típusok, technológiai park sajátosságokAbsztrakt
A kutatás célja a tudományos és technológiai parkok osztályozási szempontjainak vizsgálata. Ennek érdekében négy szempont mentén, a tulajdonosi kör, a parki tevékenységek orientációja, a betelepült szereplők köre, az ágazati fókuszáltság területén került sor egy 113 nemzetközi parkot érintő elemzésre. A felmérés alapján a cikk átfogó képet ad a nemzetközi tudományos és technológiai parkok egyes jellemzőiről. A négy terület osztályozási szempontokra épülő, páronkénti összefüggés-vizsgálata arra vezetett, hogy ezek között nincs kimutatható erős statisztikai kapcsolat. Ez alátámasztja, hogy a négy szempontra épülő osztályozási módszer alkalmas a parkok leírására, mint négy független szemszögből való értékelés. A vizsgált jellemzők átfogó elemzésével, statisztikai klaszterezés módszerévek maghatározásra kerültek tipikus parki osztályok, jellemző park típusok. Ennek gyakorlati jelentősége, hogy az eltérő parki sajátosságok eltérő menedzsment módszereket, különböző fejlesztési stratégiát igényelhetnek. Emellett, a hasonló jellegű parkok között jó lehetőség van a vélhetően hasonló menedzsment szempontok miatt a tapasztalatok megosztása és a kölcsönös tanulásra.
Hivatkozások
ALBAHARI, A., BARGE-GIL, A., PÉREZ-CANTO, S., & LONDINI, P. (2022). The effect of science and technology parks on tenant firms: A literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09949-7
ALBAHARI, A., ET AL. (2016). Technology Parks versus Science Parks: Does the university make the difference? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.012
ALMEIDA, A., AFONSO, Ó., & SILVA, M. R. (2020). Panacea or Illusion: An Empirical Analysis of European Science Parks in the Case of Follower Regions. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2020(1), 155–194. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0060
BERBEGAL-MIRABENT, J., ALEGRE, I., & GUERRERO, A. (2019). Mission statements and performance: An exploratory study of science parks. Long Range Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101932
BIGLIARDI, B., DORMIO, I., NOSELLA, A., & PETRONI, G. (2006). Assessing science parks’ performances: Directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, 26(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.002
CARAYANNIS, E. G., & CAMPBELL, D. F. J. (2009). 'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
CARAYANNIS, E. G., & CAMPBELL, D. F. (2012). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
CENNAMO, C. (2016). Building the value of next-generation platforms: The paradox of diminishing returns. Journal of Management, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316658350
CURRIE, J. (1985). Science Parks in Britain—their Role for the Late 1980s. CSP Economic Publications.
DABROWSKA, J., & FERREIRA DE FARIA, A. (2020). Performance measures to assess the success of contemporary science parks. Triple Helix, 7, 40–82. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10006
DÍEZ-VIAL, I., & MONTORO-SÁNCHEZ, Á. (2015). How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: The case of a science park. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.001
EDLER, J., & GEORGHIOU, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy, 36(7), 949–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003
ETZKOWITZ, H., & LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
ETZKOWITZ, H. (2008). The Triple Helix. Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929605
EUL, F. M., (1985). Science Parks and Innovation Centres–Property, the unconsidered element. In: J. M. Gibb, (Ed.), Science Parks and Innovation Centres: their economic and social impact. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
FEHERVOLGYI, B.; KOVACS, Z.; TOTH, CS.; HARY, A. (2022). Influence of Founders on Innovation Ecosystem Types. Journal of International Scientific Publications, Economy & Business, 16, 388-398
GALVÃO, A., MASCARENHAS, C., MARQUES, C., FERREIRA, J., & RATTEN, F. (2019). Triple helix and its evolution: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2018-0103
GAWER, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
HANSSON, F., HUSTED, K., & VESTERGAARD, J. (2005). Second generation science parks: From structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation, 25, 1039–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.003
HAKALA, H., O’SHEA, G., FARNY, S., & LUOTO, S. (2019). Re-storying the business, innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem concepts: The model-narrative review method. International Journal of Management Reviews, 00, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12212
HOBBS, K. G., LINK, A. N., & SCOTT, J. T. (2017). Science and technology parks: An annotated and analytical literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9522-3
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENCE PARK AND AREAS OF INNOVATION (2022). Global Survey Report. ISBN: 978-84-09-41243-3
JACOBIDES, M. G., CENNAMO, C., & GAWER, A. (2016). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
KATRI, V. (2015). Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: How they differ and how to survive and thrive within them. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/919
KLIMAS, P., & CZAKON, W. (2022). Species in the wild: A typology of innovation ecosystems. Review of Managerial Science, 16, 249–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00439-4
LECLUYSE, L., & KNOCKAERT, M. (2020). Disentangling satisfaction of tenants on science parks: A multiple case study in Belgium. Technovation, 98, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102156
LIBERATI, D., MARINUCCI, M., & TANZI, G. M. (2015). Science and technology parks in Italy: Main features and analysis of their effects on the firms hosted. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9397-8
LÖFSTEN, H., & LINDELÖF, P. (2005). R&D networks and product innovation patterns—Academic and non-academic new technology-based firms on science parks. Technovation, 25, 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.007
MACDONALD, S. (1987). British science parks: Reflections on the politics of high technology. R&D Management, 17(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1987.tb00045.x
MINEIRO, A. A. DA COSTA, DE SOUZA, T. A., & DE CASTRO, C. C. (2021). The quadruple and quintuple helix in innovation environments (incubators and science and technology parks). Innovation & Management Review, 18(3), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-08-2019-0098
MONCK, C. S., PORTER, R. B., QUINTAS, P., & STOREY, D. J. (1988). Science parks and the growth of high technology firms. London: Croom Helm.
NG, WEI KEAT BENNY; APPEL-MEULENBROEK, RIANNE; CLOODT, MYRIAM; ARENTZE, THEO (2018): Towards a segmentation of science parks: A typology study on science parks in Europe, Research Policy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.004
NG, W. K. B., APPEL-MEULENBROEK, H. A. J. A., CLOODT, M. M. A. H., & ARENTZE, T. A. (2019). Towards a segmentation of science parks: A typology study on science parks in Europe. Research Policy, 48(3), 719–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.004
OH, D.-S., PHILLIPS, F., PARK, S., & LEE, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
PEREIRA, R. M., MARQUES, H. R., & GAVA, R. (2019). Innovation ecosystems of Brazilian federal universities: A mapping of technological innovation centers, incubators of technology-based companies and technological parks. International Journal of Innovation, 7(3), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v7i3.66
QUINTAS, P., WIELD, D., & MASSEY, D. (1992). Academic-industry links and innovation: Questioning the science park model. Technovation, 12(3), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1987.tb00045.x
RATINHO, T., & HENRIQUES, E. (2010). The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries: Evidence from Portugal. Technovation, 30(3), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.008
SUOMINEN, A., SEPPÄNEN, M., & DEDEHAYIR, O. (2018). A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: A research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0188
THEERANATTAPONG, T., PICKERNELL, D., & SIMMS, C. (2021). The regional innovation system–university–science park nexus: A systematic literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 2017–2050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09837-y
TSUJIMOTO, M., KAJIKAWA, Y., TOMITA, J., & MATSUMOTO, Y. (2018). A review of the ecosystem concept—Towards coherent ecosystem design. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032
VAN GEENHUIZEN, M., SOETANTO, D. P., & SCHOLTEN, V. (2012). Science parks: Changing roles and changing approaches in their evaluation. In M. Van Geenhuizen & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Creating knowledge cities: Myths, visions and realities (pp. 132–156). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932853.00012
WAREHAM, J., FOX, P. B., & CANO GINER, J. L. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195–1215. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0895
WESTHEAD, P., & BATSTONE, S. (1998). Independent technology-based firms: The perceived benefits of a science park location. Urban Studies, 35(12), 2197–2219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098983845
##submission.downloads##
Megjelent
Hogyan kell idézni
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
