Modeling the Impact of Economic Interventions on Mobility Sustainability: A Multidimensional Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32976/stratfuz.2025.16Kulcsszavak:
Economic Instruments, Sustainable Mobility, Personal Utility, Social Utility, Functional space useAbsztrakt
Economic instruments provide an opportunity to influence the sustainability of mobility positively. It is important to understand the distribution of mobility forms in terms of functional space use and individual and social utility to understand the effects of applying economic instruments. Economic instruments affect social utility by influencing individual decisions based on the technical characteristics of functional space use. This paper explores these relationships, which can help determine where and to what extent currently preferred economic instruments have an impact. The model allows for identifying areas where the use of financial instruments is expected to have significant utility. This article presents the details and internal connections of the developed four-dimensional model. The created model is a suitable tool for more accurately assessing the effects of economic instruments in the future.
Hivatkozások
ALESSANDRETTI, L., SAPIEZYNSKI, P., LEHMANN, S., & BARONCHELLI, A. (2017). Multi-scale spatio-temporal analysis of human mobility. PLOS ONE, 12(2), e0171686. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171686
APARICIO, A. (2016). Exploring recent long-distance passenger travel trends in Europe. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3199-3208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.262
ATTARD, M., & ISON, S. G. (2010). The implementation of road user charging and the lessons learnt: the case of Valletta, Malta. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.05.009
BARBOSA, H., BARTHELEMY, M., GHOSHAL, G., JAMES, C. R., LENORMAND, M., LOUAIL, T., MENEZES, R., RAMASCO, J. J., SIMINI, F., & TOMASINI, M. (2018). Human mobility: Models and applications. Physics Reports, 734, 1-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.01.001
BOLTZE M., & REUSSWIG, A. (2000). First Review of Avaliable Data: Modal Split in Different Countries. AICPR/PIARC C4. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Verkehr Fachbereich 13 · Bauingenieurwesen und Geodäsie. https://www.verkehr.tu-darmstadt.de/media/verkehr/fgvv/for/publik/S010.pdf (Reached 12.18.2024.)
CRIVELLARI, A., & RESCH, B. (2022). Investigating functional consistency of mobility-related urban zones via motion-driven embedding vectors and local POI-type distributions. Computational Urban Science, 2(19). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-022-00049-8
CZAJKOWSKI, M., GIERGICZNY, M., KRONENBERG, J., & ENGLIN, J. (2019). The individual travel cost method with consumer-specific values of travel time savings. Environmental and Resource Economics, 74, 961-984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00355-6
EEA. (2024, October 10). Passenger transport activity. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/sustainability-of-europes-mobility-systems/passenger-transport-activity (Retrieved 2024.12.22.)
ERF (European Union Road Federation). Passanger Transport 2023. https://erf.be/statistics/passenger-transport-2023/ (Retrieved 2024.12.22.)
EUROSTAT. (n.d.). Passenger mobility statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Passenger_mobility_statistics (Retrieved 2024.12.22.)
GALLOTTI, R., SACCO, P., & DE DOMENICO, M. (2021). Complex urban systems: Challenges and integrated solutions for the sustainability and resilience of cities. Complexity, 2021(1), 1782354. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1782354
GHANBARI, M., KARIMI, M., CLARAMUNT, C., & LAGESSE, C. (2024). A Spatial Interaction Model for the Identification of Urban Functional Regions. In M. Lotfian, & L. L. L. Starace (Eds.), Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems. W2GIS 2024 (Vol. 14673, pp. 195–209). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60796-7_14
HEINEKE, K., LAVERTY, N., MÖLLER, T., & ZIEGLER, F. (2023). The future of mobility. McKinsey Quarterly, 2023(April 19), 1-14. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/the-future-of-mobility-mobility-evolves (Reached 16.12.2024.)
HERMÁNDY-BERENCZ, J. (2003). A mobilitás szerepe az Európai Unióban. Új Pedagógiai Szemle, 1, 117-124.
HORVÁTH, I., BERKI, B., SUDÁR, A., CSAPÓ, Á., & BARANYI, P. (2024). Cognitive Mobility. In Cognitive Aspects of Virtual Reality (pp. 49-63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68130-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68130-1_3
HÖRCHER, D., & TIRACHINI, A. (2021). A review of public transport economics. Economics of transportation, 25, 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100196
INFRASTRUCTURE USA. (2017). Public transportation's impact on rural and small towns. American Public Transportation Association (APTA). Retrieved from https://infrastructureusa.org/public-transportations-impact-rural-small-towns/
INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT FORUM. (2023). Key Transport Statistics, 2023. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/key-transport-statistics-2023.pdf (Reached 12.22.2024.)
KOCZISZKY, G. (2022). A New Perspective on Sustainability. Financial And Economic Review, 21(4), 217-219.
LAKATOS, A., & MÁNDOKI, P. (2020). Sustainability analysis of competition in public transport systems: A comparative case study in Hungary and Finland. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 64(2), 545-556. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.14824
LANG, N., HAGENMAIER, M., SMILKSTINS, A., SACKMANN, S., BOUTENKO, V., SARGEANT, R., BENATTI, E., & WAHL, J. (2024, October 28). Moving Millions: A Recipe to Make Urban Mobility Work. BCG Automotive Industry.
ŁUCZYSZYN, K. (2024). Sustainable transport – development and goals. Cognitive Sustainability, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.55343/cogsust.92
MOSLEM, S., MOHAMMADI, M., ISMAEL, K., & ESZTERGÁR-KISS, D. (2025). Fostering sustainable urban mobility via stakeholder engagement: A novel analytic hierarchy process and half-quadratic programming. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 59, 101291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101291
NAVIT. (n.d.). Bus, train, car or e-scooter: Carbon emissions of transport modes ranked. https://www.navit.com/resources/bus-train-car-or-e-scooter-carbon-emissions-of-transport-modes-ranked (Retrieved December 22, 2024)
OESCHGER, G., CAULFIELD, B., & CARROLL, P. (2023). Investigating the role of micromobility for first- and last-mile connections to public transport. Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmr.2023.100001
PUCHER, J., & RENNE, J. L. (2005). Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. Transportation, 32, 165-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-5508-3
ROTHENGATTER, W. (1994). Do external benefits compensate for external costs of transport?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 28(4), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(94)90006-X
SCHWINGER, F., TANRIVERDI, B., & JARKE, M. (2022). Comparing Micromobility with Public Transportation Trips in a Data-Driven Spatio-Temporal Analysis. Sustainability, 14(14), 8247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148247
SMALL, K. A. (2012). Valuation of travel time. Economics of Transportation 1(1–2), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2012.09.002
SMALL, K. A. & GOMEZ-IBANEZ, J. A. (1998). Road Pricing, Trafc Congestion and the Environment: Issues of Efficiency and Social Feasibility. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
STATISTA. (2024, January 30). Transportation and Logistics, Modal split in passenger transport worldwide in 2022 with a forecast for 2030. Statista Research Department.
SURMAŘOVÁ, S., NEUMANNOVÁ, M., PAŘIL, V., VRÁNA, M., & CHMELÍK, J. (2025). Do I really like to shift to rail? Influence of rail modernisation on passenger preferences. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 59, 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101284
SZALMÁNÉ CS. M., ZÖLDY, M., & TÖRÖK, Á. (2024). Új mobilitási megoldások: technikai lehetőségek és pénzügyi aspektusok a fenntarthatóság tükrében. In A pénz jövője, a jövő pénze I-II. Budapest: MNB.
TANG, C. K. (2021). The cost of traffic: Evidence from the London congestion charge. Journal of Urban Economics, 121, 103302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2020.103302
TRAIN, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press.
TRANSPORT DIRECT (2008). Kilograms of CO2 per passenger kilometre for different modes of transport within the UK. https://www.aef.org.uk/downloads/Grams_CO2_transportmodesUK.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiW1a6_47uKAxWY_rsIHbzoE0AQFnoECBMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0hu7xC77NNiwTA6kWycMfg (Retrieved 12.22.2024.)
TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS ANNUAL REPORT. (2023). Bureau of Transportation Statistics. https://www.bts.gov/sites/bts.dot.gov/files/2023-12/TSAR-2023_123023.pdf (Retrieved 12.22.2024.)
WARDMAN, M. (2001). A review of British evidence on time and service quality valuations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 37(2-3), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(00)00012-0
WENGRITZKY, Z. (2023). Spatial analysis of the BEV market and the corresponding charging infrastructure in Hungary. Cognitive Sustainability, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.55343/cogsust.50
ZAMPROGNO, M. M., & ESZTERGÁR-KISS, D. (2024). Applying Cluster Analysis for the Investigation of Travel Behavior and User Profiles. Periodica Polytechnica: Transportation Engineering, 52(4) 25663. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.25663
ZÖLDY, M., CSETE, M. S., KOLOZSI, P. P., BORDAS, P., & TOROK, A. (2022). Cognitive sustainability. Cognitive Sustainability, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.55343/cogsust.7
ZÖLDY, M., & KOLOZSI, P. P. (2025). Analysis Of Economic Policy Instruments To Promote Sustainable Mobility. Acta Universitatis Sapientia - Economics and Business, 13, (online first) 13-29.
ZÖLDY, M. (2024). Changes at mobility space use in the cognitive mobility era. Acta Technica Jaurinensis, 17(4), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.14513/actatechjaur.00750
ZÖLDY, M., & BARANYI, P. (2023). The Cognitive Mobility Concept. Infocommunications Journal,(SP), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.36244/ICJ.2023.SI-IODCR.6
ZÖLDY, M., BARANYI, P., & TÖRÖK, Á. (2024). Trends in Cognitive Mobility in 2022. Acta Polytecnica Hungarica, 21, 189-202. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.21.7.2024.7.11
##submission.downloads##
Megjelent
Hogyan kell idézni
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.