Beágyazott dilemma: A munkaerő-piaci integrációt segítő társadalmi vállalkozások hibrid jellegének vizsgálata
Kulcsszavak:
hibrid szervetek, társadalmi vállalkozás, munkaerő-piaci integráció, céltorzulás, érintetti konfliktusAbsztrakt
A társadalmi vállalkozások fogalma, potenciális szociálpolitikai és gazdasági szerepe tudományos és szakpolitikai viták tárgya. Miközben sok helyen a jóléti rendszer működésének megújítását, a gazdasági és társadalmi célok egyfajta kompromisszumát látják benne, jelen tanulmány inkább egyik speciális típusának, a munkaerő-piaci integrációt segítő társadalmi vállalkozások konfliktusos jellegének elemzésével foglalkozik. A kettős optimalizálás nem csak a társadalmi és gazdasági dimenzió egymás mellé rendelése, hanem a szervezeti működés során a célok torzulásának és az érintettek konfliktusának forrása is, amely adott esetben a társadalmi vállalkozások fenntarthatóságát, társadalmi és gazdasági céljainak elérését veszélyezteti.
Hivatkozások
ALTER, K. (2007): Social Enterprise Typology. Virtue Ventures LLC
AUSTIN, J. – STEVENSON, H. – WEI-SKILLEM, J. (2006): Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? IN: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Vol. 30. No. 1.
BATTILANA, J. – LEE, M. (2014): Advancing research on hybrid organizing. IN: The Academy of Management Annals. Vol. 8. No. 1. pp. 397.441.
BERGERON, S. – HEALY, S. (2015): The business case: a community economies approach to gender, development and social economy. IN: Utting, P. (szerk.) Social and solidarity economy – Beyond the fringe. London: Zed Books. pp. 72-85.
BESHAROV, M. - SMITH, W. K. (2013): Multiple logics within organizations: An integrative framework and model of organizational hybridity. Elérhető: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/conferences/2013-paulrlawrence/Documents/Multiple%20logics%20within%20organizations_Besharov%20and%20Smith_for%20conference%20distribution_05.07.13.pdf letöltés dátuma: 2016. 11. 15.
BODE, I. – EVERS, A. – SCHULZ, A. (2006): Work integration social enterprise in Europe: can hybridization be sustainable? IN: Nyssens, M. (szerk.) Social enterprise. New Yor: Routledge. pp. 237-258.
BORZAGA, C. – DEFOURNY, J. (2004): Social enterprises in Europe: a diversity of initiatives and prospects. IN: Borzaga, C. – Defourny, J. (szerk.) The emergence of social enterprise. New York: Routledge. pp. 350-359.
BORZAGA, C. - DEPEDRI, S. (2014): When social enterprises do it better: efficiency and efficacy of work integration in italian social cooperatives. IN: Denny, S. – Seddon, F. (szerk.) Social enterprise: Accountability and evaluation around the world. New York: Routledge. pp. 85-101.
COONEY, K. (2011): The business of job creation: An examination of the social enterprise approach to workforce development. IN: Journal of Poverty. Vol. 15. No. 1. pp. 88-107.
DAVISTER, C. – DEFOURNY, J. – GREGOIRE, O. (2004): Work integration social enterprises in the European Union: an overview of existing models. Elérhető: http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/bitstream/2268/90492/1/Work%20Integration%20Social%20Enterprises%20in%20the%20European%20Union_An%20overview%20of%20existing%20models.pdf letöltés dátuma: 2016. 11. 12.
DEES, G. J. (1998): The Meaning of "Social Entrepreneurship. Elérhető:http://www.redalmarza.cl/ing/pdf/TheMeaningofsocialEntrepreneurship.pdf letöltés dátuma: 2016. 11. 18.
DEFOURNY, J. – NYSSENS, M. (2012): The EMES approach os social enterprise in a comparative perspective. Elérhető: http://www.emes.net/uploads/media/EMES-WP-12-03_Defourny-Nyssens.pdf letöltés dátuma: 2016. 11. 18.
DEPEDRI, S. (2010): The competitive advantages of social enterprises. IN: Becchetti, L. – Borzaga, C. (szerk) The economics of social responsibility. New York: Rotledge. pp. 34-54.
DIOCHON, M. – ANDERSON, A. R. (2011): Ambivalance and ambiguity in social enterprise: Narratives about values in reconciling purpose and practices. IN: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Vol. 7. No. 1. pp. 93-109.
DOHERTY, B. – FOSTER, G. – MASON, C. – MEEHAN, J. – MEEHAN, K. – ROTHEROE, N. – ROYCE, M. (2009): Management of social enterprise. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. pp. 90-110.
DOHERTY, B. – HAUGH, H. – LYON, F. (2014): Social enterprisesas hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. IN: International Journal of Management Reviews. Vol 16. pp. 417-436.
ELKENBERRY, A. M. (2009): Refusing the market: A demorcratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. IN: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2009. No: 38. pp. 582-596.
ENJOLRAS, B. (2014) The associative as governance structure IN: Defourny, J. – Hulgard, L. – Pestoff, V. (szerk.) Social enterprise and the third sector – Changing european landscape in a comparative perspective. London: Routledge. pp. 187-211.
GALASKIEWICZ, J. – BARRINGER, S. N. (2012): Social enterprise and social categories. IN: IN: Gidron, B. – Hasenfeld, Y. (szerk.) Social enterprise: An organizational perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 47-70.
GARROW, E. - HASENFELD, Y. (2012): Managing conflicting institutional logics: Social Service versus market. IN: Gidron, B. – Hasenfeld, Y. (szerk.) Social enterprise: An organizational perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 121-143.
GIDRON, B. – MONNICKENDAM-GIVON, Y. (2016): A social welfare perspective market-oriented social enterprises. IN: International Journal of Social Welfare. July 2016. pp. 1-14.
GONIN, M. – BESHAROV, M. – SMITH, W. – GACHET, N. (2012): Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. IN: Business Ethics Quarterly. May 2013.
HULGARD, L. (2014): Social enterprise and the third sector – Innovative service delivery or a non-capitalist economy? IN: Defourny, J. – Hulgard, L. – Pestoff, V. (szerk.) Social enterprise and the third sector – Changing european landscape in a comparative perspective. London: Routledge. pp. 66-85.
HUYBRECHTS, B. – MERTENS, S. – RIJPENS, J. (2014): Explaining stakeholder involvement in social enterprise governance through resources and legitimacy. IN: Defourny, J. – Hulgard, L. – Pestoff, V. (szerk.) Social enterprise and the third sector – Changing european landscape in a comparative perspective. London: Routledge. pp. 157-176.
FOSFUR, A. – GIRRATANA, M. S. – ROCA, E. (2016): Social business hybrids: Demand externalities, competitive advantage, and growth through diversification. IN: Organization Science. Vol. 27. No. 5. pp. 1275-1289.
HANSMANN, H. B. (1980): The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal. Vol. 89. No 5. pp. 835-901.
HUDSON, R. (2009): Life on the edge: Navigation the competitive tensions between the ‚social‘ and the ‚economic‘ in the social economy and in its relations to the mainstream. IN: Journal of Economic Geography. Vol. 9. No. 4. pp. 493-51.
LAVILLE, J. L. (2015): Social and solidarity economy in historical perspective. IN: Utting, P. (szerk.) Social and solidarity economy – Beyond the fringe. London: Zed Books. pp. 41-56.
MASON, C. – BRYDE, D. J. (2007). Form stakeholders to institutions: The changing face of social enterprise governance theory. IN: Management Decision, 2007/11.
MCMURTRY, J-J. (2015): Prometheus, Trojan horse or frankenstein? Appraising the social and solidarity economy. IN: Utting, P. (szerk.) Social and solidarity economy – Beyond the fringe. London: Zed Books. pp. 57 – 71.
MOIZER, J. – TRACEY, P. (2010): Strategy Making in Social Enterprise: The Role of Resource Allocation and It’s Effects on Organizational Sustainability. Elérhető:http://www.rise.or.kr/RBS/Data/Files/fnAAN/research01/10.pdf letöltés dátuma: 2016. 11. 12.
NYSSENS, M. (2014) European work integration social enterprises: Between social innovation and isomorphism. IN: Defourny, J. – Hulgard, L. – Pestoff, V. (szerk.) Social enterprise and the third sector – Changing european landscape in a comparative perspective. London: Routledge. pp. 211-230.
PACHE, A-C. – SANTOS, F. (2013): Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. IN: Academy of Management Journal. Vol 56. No. 4. pp. 972-1001.
PERKINS, D. (2009): Welfare to work and social inclusion: Challenges and possibilities. IN: Social Inclusion Research Forum, University of Melbourne, 25–26 June.
SANTOS, F. – PACHE, A-C – BIRKHOLZ, C. (2015): Making Hybrids Work: Aligning Business Models and Organizational Design for Social Enterprises. IN: California Management Review, Vol. 57 No. 3, Spring. pp. 36-58
SEANOR, P. -BULL, M. - RIDLEY-DUFF, R. (2007): Mapping social enterprise:do social enterprise actors draw straight lines or circles? IN: 4thSocial Enterprise Research Conference, London South Bank University,4-5 July 2007.
SMITH, W. K. – BESHAROV, M. - WESSELS, A. K. –CHERTOK, M. (2012): A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. IN: Academy os Management Learning & Education. Vol 11. No. 3. pp. 463-378.
SPEAR, R. – CORNFORTH, C. – AIKEN, M. (2014): Major perspectives on govvernance of social enterprise IN: Defourny, J. – Hulgard, L. – PESTOFF, V. (szerk.) Social enterprise and the third sector – Changing european landscape in a comparative perspective. London: Routledge. pp. 133-157.
TEASDALE, S. (2012a): Negotating tensions: How do social enterprises in the homlessness field balance social and commercial considerations? IN: Housing Studies, Vol. 27. No. 4. pp. 514-532.
TEASDALE, S. (2012b): What’s in a Name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses. IN: Public Policy and Administration Vol. 27 No. 2. pp- 1-22.
TORTIA, E. (2010): The impact of social enterprises on output, employment, and welfare. IN:Becchetti, L. – Borzaga, C. (szerk.) The economics of social responsibility. New York: Rotledge. pp. 59-61.
VIDAL, I. (2014): Multi-stakeholder governance in social enterprise. IN: Defourny, J. – Hulgard, L. – Pestoff, V. (szerk.) Social enterprise and the third sector – Changing european landscape in a comparative perspective. London: Routledge. pp. 176-187.
WELLENS, L. – JEGERS, M. (2013): Effective governance in nonprofit organizations: A literature based multiple stakeholder approach. IN: European Management Journal 2013.
WILKINSON, A. – DUNDON, T. (2010): Direct employee participation. IN: Wilkinson, A. – Gollan, P. J. – Marchington, M. – Lewin, D. (szerk.) The Oxford handbook of participation in organizations. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 167-185.
YOUNG, D. R. – LECY, J. D. (2016): The role of social entrepreneurs in the social enterprise zoo. IN: Young, D. R. – Searing, E. A. M. – Brewer, C. V. (szerk.) The social enterprise zoo: A guide for perplexed scholars, entrepreneurs, philanthropist, leaders, investors, and policymakers. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 113-142.
ZAMAGNI, S. (2005): A civil-economic theory of the cooperative enterprise. Elérhető: https://www.uvic.ca/research/centres/cccbe/assets/docs/speakers/Zamagni_Theory_of_Cooperative_Enterprise.pdf letöltés dátuma: 2016. 11. 18.
##submission.downloads##
Megjelent
Hogyan kell idézni
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
