Sentencing guidelines based on the US model for criminal and administrative penalties against associations in the European Union

Authors

  • Gerhard Dannecker Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Gerhard Dannecker, Senior professor, Institute of German, European, and International Criminal Law and Procedural Law, University of Heidelberg, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46941/2025.se1.7

Keywords:

Sentencing guidelines for corporations, United States sentencing guidelines, Sentencing corporations in Austria and Germany.

Abstract

Associations responsible for criminal violations are sanctioned with various sanctions in the member states of the European Union – criminal penalties or fines. These sanctions vary in severity and are enforced in different ways, as a look at Austria and Germany shows. To achieve fair and consistent sanctioning in this area, the literature repeatedly calls for to establish sentencing guidelines for corporations based on the model of the US sentencing guidelines to reduce sentencing discrepancies and promote transparency and proportionality in sentencing. This article argues that legal systems based on a statute law system are rightly should adhere to their own legal institutions and cultures. This allows for integration of the association sanctions into the respective national criminal justice systems without causing internal systemic distortions, which can lead to a lack of acceptance by the law enforcement authorities and the associations concerned.

References

Achenbach, H. (2024) ‚Sanktionen gegen die Rechtsträger von Unternehmen‘, in Achenbach, H., Ransiek, A., Rönnau, T. (eds.) Handbuch Wirtschaftsstrafrecht. (Kapitel 1.2) 6th ed. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, pp. 6-30.

Albano, J., Sanyshyn, A. (2016) ‘Corporate Criminal Liability’, American Criminal Law Review, 53, pp. 1027–1048.

Altenburg, J., Peukert, M. (2014) ‘Neuerungen in § 30 OWiG – Haftungsrisiken und -vermeidung vor dem Hintergrund gesetzgeberischen Überschwangs (§ 30 OWiG)‘, Betriebs-Berater (BB), 13, pp. 649–655.

Baier-Gabner, M. (2020) ‘Die Verbandsgeldbuße, ihre Bemessung, bedingte Nachsicht und Weisungen (§§ 4–9 Vb-VG)c‘, in Soyer, R. (ed.) Handbuch Unternehmensstrafrecht. Wien: Manz Verlag, pp. 89-109.

Baker, J. (2004) ‘Reforming Corporations Threats of Federal Prosecution’, Cornell Law Review, 89(2), pp. 310–350.

Bauer, C. (2004) ‘Neue strafrechtliche Sanktionen gegen Verbände‘, Österreichische Juristen-Zeitung (ÖJZ), 2004/13, pp. 491–498.

Becker, R., Canzler, S. (2014) ‘Die WpHG-Bußgeldrichtlinien der BaFin – Eine Übersicht unter Berücksichtigung erster praktischer Erfahrungen‘, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht (NZG), vol (28), pp. 1090–1096.

Beckmann, M. (2021) Verbandssanktionen – Ein Rechtsvergleich des Straf- und Ordnungswidrigkeitenrechts in Deutschland und den USA. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.

Bowman, F. O. (1996) ‘The Quality of Mercy Must Be Restrained, and Other Lessons to Love the Federal Sentencing Guidelines’, Wisconsin Law Review, pp. 679–749.

Bowman, F. O. (2005) ‘The Failure of the Sentencing Guidelines: A Structural Analysis’, Columbia Law Review, 105(4), pp. 1315–1350.

Demleitner, N., Berman, D. A., Miller, M. L., Wright, R. F. (2020) Sentencing Law and Policy: Cases, Statutes and Guidelines. 5th ed. Burlington: Aspen Publishing.

Eastman, L. K. (2010) ‘Revising the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines to Eliminate the Focus on Compliance Programs and Cooperation in Determining Corporate Sentence Mitigation’, Minnesota Law Review, 94(1620), pp. 1620–1650.

Engelhart, M. (2012) Sanktionierung von Unternehmen und Compliance: Eine rechtsvergleichende Analyse des Straf- und Ordnungswidrigkeitenrechts in Deutschland und in den USA. 2nd ed. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot; https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-13947-7.

Eufinger, A. (2018) ‘Verbandsgeldbuße nach § 30 OWiG und Compliance‘, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP), 39(13), pp. 615–620.

Ferrell, O. C., LeClair, D. T., Ferrel, L. (1998) ‘The Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations: A Framework for Ethical Compliance’, Journal of Business Ethics, 17, pp. 353–363; https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005786809479.

Frase, R., Mitchell, K. L. (2020) ‘Sentencing Guidelines in the United States’, in Spohn, C., Brennan, P. C. (eds.) Handbook on Sentencing Policies and Practices in the 21st Century. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 43-67; https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429027765-3.

Freed, D. J. (1992) ‘Federal Sentencing in the Wake of Guidelines: Unacceptable Limits on the Discretion of Sentencers’, Yale Law Journal, 101(1681), pp.1682–1754; https://doi.org/10.2307/796945.

Freiberg, A., Roberts, J. (2022) ‘Sentencing Commission and Guidelines: A Case Study in Policy’, Criminal Law Forum, 34, pp. 87–129; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-022-09447-3.

von Galen, M., Schaefer, K. (2022) ‘OWiG’, in Leitner, W., Rosenau, H. (eds.) Wirtschafts- und Steuerstrafrecht. 2nd ed, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, pp. 895-922.

Glotzbach, S. (2024) Sanktionsbemessung bei Unternehmen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot; https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-59213-5.

Goldstein, A. D. (2004) ‚What Feeney Got Right: Why Courts of Appeals Should Review Sentencing Departures De Novo’, Yale Law Journal, 113(8), pp. 1955–1990; https://doi.org/10.2307/4135786.

Gruner, R. S. (1992) ‘Just Punishment and Adequate Deterrence for Organizational Misconduct: Scaling Economic Penalties under the New Corporate Guidelines’, California Law Review, 66, pp. 225–229.

Gruner, R. S. (1994) ‘Towards an Organizational Jurisprudence: Transforming Corporate Criminal Law through Federal Sentencing Reform’, Arizona Law Review, 36(2), pp. 407–472.

Henssler, M., Hoven, E., Kubiziel, M., Weigend, T. (2017) Kölner Entwurf eines Verbandssanktionsgesetzes. Köln: Volkswagen Stiftung.

Hertel, F. (2019) Effective Internal Control and Corporate Compliance. Baden-Baden: Nomos; https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845299068.

Hester, R. (2020) ‘Sentencing in US-American Jurisdictions’, in Ambos, K. (ed.) Sentencing: Anglo-American and German Insights. Göttingen: University Press, pp. 175–214.

Howard-Nicolas, D. H. (2013) ‘Negotiated Federal Sentencing Guidelines: A Cure for the Federal Sentencing Debacle’, Administrative Law Review, 65(3), pp. 665–688.

Jareborg, J.-M. (1989) ‘Introductory Report’, in Europarat/Colloque Criminologique, Disparities in Sentencing Causes and Solutions, Strasbourg, 1989: Council of Europe, Legal Affairs, pp. 7-19.

Johnson, T. A. (2006) ‘Sentencing Organizations after Booker’, Yale Law Journal, 116(3), pp. 632–645; https://doi.org/10.2307/20455733.

King, N. J. (2012) ‘Procedure at Sentencing’, in Petersilia, J. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 317-335; https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730148.013.0013.

Konopatsch, C. (2010) ‚Die Bedeutung unternehmensrechtlicher Compliance-Strategien zur Strafprozessvermeidung und Strafprozessführung am Beispiel des Transportgewerbes‘, in Hotter, M., Lunzer, H., Schick, P., Soyer, R. (eds.) Unternehmensstrafrecht – eine Praxisanleitung mit Beispielen. Wien/Graz: NWV, pp. 131–179.

Krems, K. H. (2015) ‚Der NRW-Entwurf für ein Verbandsstrafgesetzbuch: Gesetzgeberische Intention und Konzeption‘, Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik (ZIS), 2015/1, pp. 5–10.

Kubiciel, M. (2016) ‘Die deutschen Unternehmensgeldbußen: Ein nicht wettbewerbsfähiges Modell und seine Alternativen‘, Neue Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-, Steuer- und Unternehmensstrafrecht (NZWiSt), 2016/5, pp. 178–181.

Lehmkuhl, M., Zeder, F. (2025) Verbandswverantwortlichkeitsgesetz. 2nd ed., Wien: Manz Verlag, § 5, 6, 8.

Lenk, M. (2021) Sanktionierung von Unternehmen: Status quo, Defizite und Alternativen de lege ferenda. Berlin: Peter Lang; https://doi.org/10.3726/b17485.

Maurer, R. J. (1992) ‘Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations: How Do They Work and What Are They Supposed to Do?’, University of Dayton Law Review, 18, pp. 799–810.

Miller, E. H. (1993) ‘Sentencing Guidelines for Organizational Defendants’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 46(1), pp.197–234.

Mueller, R. S. (1990) ‘Advatages of the Department of Justice Proposal for Sentencing Organizations’, Fed. Sent. Repp. 3, pp. 130-145; https://doi.org/10.2307/20639308.

Nagel, I. H. (1990) ‘Foreword: Structuring Sentencing Discretion. The New Federal Sentencing Guidelines’, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 80(4), pp. 883–943; https://doi.org/10.2307/1143685.

Nunes, J. W. (1995) ‘Organizational Sentencing Guidelines: The Conundrum of Compliance Programs and Self-Reporting’, Arizona Law Review, 27, pp. 1039–1044.

Ogletree, C. J. (1988) ‘The Death of Discretion? Reflections on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines’, Harvard Law Review, 101, pp. 1938–1960; https://doi.org/10.2307/1341443.

Otten, S. (2005) Die Sanktionierung von Unternehmen: Die rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zum Recht der USA und Deutschland unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Kartellrechts. Tönning: Grundlagen-Verlag.

Parker, J. S. (1993) ‘Rules Without …: Some Critical Reflections on the Corporate Sentencing Guidelines’, Washington University Law Review, 71(2), pp. 397–442.

Pryor, W. H. (2016) ‘Returning to Marvin Frankel’s First Principles in Federal Sentencing Guidelines’, Federal Sentencing Reporter, 29(2/3), pp. 95–103; https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2017.29.2-3.95.

Rakoff, J. S. (2013) ‘Why the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Should Be Scrapped’, Federal Sentencing Reporter, 26(1), pp. 6–9; https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2013.26.1.6.

Reitz, K. R. (2012) ‘The Traditional Indeterminate Sentencing Model’, in Petersilia, J. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections. New York: New York Press, pp. 270-298; https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730148.013.0011.

Rogall, K. (2025) ‘Geldbuße gegen juristische Personen und Personenvereinigungen‘, in Mitsch, W. (ed.) Karlsruher Kommentar zum Gesetz über Ordnungswidrigkeiten: OWiG. München: Verlag C.H. Beck, § 30 OWiG.

Schmidt, W. (2024) Vermögensabschöpfung: Handbuch für das Straf- und Ordnungswidrigkeitenverfahren. München: C.H. Beck.

Sieber, J. (2018) Sanktionen gegen Wirtschaftskriminalität. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot; https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-55476-8.

Sieber, U. (2008) ‘Compliance-Programme im Unternehmensstrafrecht: Ein neues Konzept zur Kontrolle von Wirtschaftskriminalität‘, in Sieber, U., Dannecker, G., Kindhäuser, U., Vogel, J., Walter, T. (eds.) Festschrift für Klaus Tiedemann. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag, pp. 461–496.

Soto, P. G., Debold, D., Chesley (2020) ‘Sentencing of Organizations’, in Debold, D. (ed.) Practice Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Vol. I, 6th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, chap. 16.

Spoerr, W. (2023) ‘§ 120 WpHG‘, in Assmann, H.-D., Schneider, U. H., Mühlberg, P.O. (eds.) Wertpapierhandelsrecht, WPhG, 8th ed., Köln: Verlag Otto Schmidt.

Steininger, E. (2018) Verbandsverantwortlichkeitsgesetz – Lehrbuch. 2nd ed. Wien: Linde Verlag.

Steininger, E. (2020) Verbandsverantwortlichkeitsgesetz – Kommentar. 2nd ed. Wien: Linde Verlag.

Stith, K., Cabranes, J. A. (1998) Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Tonry, M. (1996) Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.

Waßmer, L. (2024) ‘§ 30 OWiG‘, in Graf, J. P., Jäger, M., Wittig, P. (eds.) Wirtschafts- und Steuerstrafrecht. 3rd ed. München: C.H. Beck, pp. 1329-1366.

Webb, D. K., Molo, S. F. (1993) ‘Some Practical Considerations in Developing Effective Compliance Programs: A Framework for Meeting the Requirements of the Sentencing Guidelines’, Washington University Law Review, 71(2), pp. 375–396.

Wegner, C. (2000) Die Systematik der Zumessung unternehmensbezogener Geldbußen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag.

Weisberg, R. (2008) ‘Wie sich Strafzumessungskommissionen als gute Idee erwiesen‘, Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 12(2), pp. 179–230.

Weisberg, R. (2012) ‘The Sentencing Commission Model, 1970s to Present’, in Petersilia, J., Reitz, K. R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections. New York: New York Press, pp. 299-316; https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730148.013.0012.

United States Sentencing Commission (1996) Corporate Crime in America: Strengthening the “Good Citizen” Corporation. Washington D.C.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-29

How to Cite

Dannecker, G. (2025). Sentencing guidelines based on the US model for criminal and administrative penalties against associations in the European Union. European Integration Studies, 21(1 (se), 125–153. https://doi.org/10.46941/2025.se1.7