Sustainable Animal Welfare: A 21st Century Imperative and Transnational Legal Considerations, with Emphasis on Hungary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46941/2025.se1.19Keywords:
sustainable animal protection, environmental conservation, one health, one welfare, biophilia hypothesis, deadly link.Abstract
In the 21st century, Sustainable Animal Protection (SAP) has emerged as a critical imperative, intertwining ethical, environmental, and legal considerations. This article explores the multifaceted nature of SAP, with a focus on its potential legal dimensions within Hungary. SAP extends beyond mere humane treatment, encompassing broader sustainability goals, such as environmental preservation and economic viability. The legal landscape governing animal welfare is complex, requiring a delicate balance between advancing animal welfare and addressing economic interests. International conventions and supranational legislation guide in promoting sustainable practices, emphasizing the importance of transnational cooperation. However, further legal research is needed to address critical areas such as legal harmonization, enforcement mechanisms, public participation, and stakeholder capacity-building. By aligning national legislation with EU standards, participating in international agreements, the appointment of dedicated officials, and the establishment of advisory bodies, Hungary contributes to global efforts in sustainable animal welfare. However, challenges remain in translating legal frameworks into effective action, particularly in enforcement and public commitment. Moving forward, prioritizing SAP within policy agendas and fostering collaboration across sectors and borders will be essential to ensure the well-being of animals while advancing sustainability goals in the 21st century. By integrating sustainability principles into all aspects of animal protection, investing in research and education, and promoting responsible animal-keeping practices, nations can work collaboratively to achieve a more sustainable future for both animals and humans.
References
Babos, E. (2013) ‘Állatasszisztált terápia. Módszertani előtanulmány óvodáskorú gyerekek kutyával történő fejlesztésére’, Alkalmazott pszichológia, 13(3), pp. 59-81.
Bergmann, I. M. (2019) ’Interspecies Sustainability to Ensure Animal Protection: Lessons from the Thoroughbred Racing Industry’, Sustainability, 11(19), 5539; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195539.
Boisvert, V., Vivien, F. D. (2005) ‘The Convention on Biological Diversity’, Ecological Economics, 53(4), pp. 461-472; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.030.
Csintalan, Cs., Fodor K., Gyertyán I., Ózsvári L., Visnyei, L. (2016) Az állatvédelem általános és jogi vonatkozásai’. Egyetemi jegyzet. Második, átdolgozott kiadás. Budapest: SZIE-ÁOTK, Állat-egészségügyi Igazgatástani és Agrárgazdaságtani Tanszék.
Farrier, D., Tucker, L. (2000) ‘Wise use of Wetlands under the Ramsar Convention: a challenge for meaningful implementation of international law’, Journal of Environmental Law, 12(1), pp. 21-42; https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/12.1.21.
Fromm, E. (1973) The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. First ed. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Kárteszi, N. (2023) Állatkínzás és emberek elleni erőszak összefüggése, különös tekintettel az állatkínzás és a családon belüli erőszak közötti kapcsolatra. Szakdolgozat. Miskolc: Miskolci Egyetem.
Macdonald, J. M., Boyd, S., Galvin, J. A. (1961) The murderer and his victim. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas.
Morelli, J. (2011) ‘Environmental sustainability: A Definition for Environmental Professionals’, Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), pp. 1-9; https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0002.
Paulovics, A. (2003) Problematical Aspects of Legal Regulations Concerning Animal Protection. Miskolc: Bíbor.
Paulovics, A., Bragyova, A. (2018) ‘The Protection of Wildlife’, in Kékesi, T. (ed.) Multiscience XXXII. MicroCAD International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference, Miskolc: University of Miskolc, pp. 1-7; https://doi.org/10.26649/musci.2018.041.
Pearce, D., Moran, D. (1994) The Economic Value of Biodiversity. First ed. London: Routledge.
Perczel, Gy. (1992) ‘Adalékok a környezetvédelem intézményesülésének történetéhez’, Magyar Közigazgatás, 42(1), pp. 31-37.
Sellheim, N., Schumacher J. (2022) ‘Increasing the Effectiveness of the Bonn Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species’, Journal of International Wildlife and Policy, 25(4), pp. 367-383; https://doi.org/10.1080/13880292.2022.2153461.
Slingerland, M. A., Klijn, J. A., Jongman, R. H. G., van der Schans, J. W. (2003) The unifying power of sustainable development; towards balanced choices between people, planet and profit in agricultural production chains and rural land use: the role of science. (WUR-report). Wageningen: Wageningen University.
Tarazona, A. M., Ceballos, M. C., Broom, D. M. (2020) ‘Human Relationships with Domestic and Other Animals: One Health, One Welfare, One Biology’, Animals, 10(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010043.
Trouwborst, A. (2012) ‘Transboundary Wildlife Conservation in a Changing Climate: Adaptation of the Bonn Convention on Migratory Species and Its Daughter Instruments to Climate Change’, Diversity, 2012/4, pp. 258-300; https:/doi.org/10.3390/d4030258
Vetter, Sz. (2020) Az állatkínzás szabályozása gazdasági és társadalmi mutatók tükrében. PhD thesis, Gödöllő: Szent István Egyetem.
Vetter, Sz. (2023) ‘Az állatkínzás büntetőjogi tényállásának szigorítása Magyarországon az elmúlt évtizedek kriminológiai és pszichológiai kutatásainak tükrében’, Ügyészek lapja, 2023(3), [Online]. Available at: https://ugyeszeklapja.hu/?p=4216 (Accessed: 3 March 2024)
Vetter, Sz. (2024) Állatvédelmi jog. Budapest, L’Harmattan.
Vetter, Sz., Vasa, L., Ózsvári, L. (2014) ‘Economic Aspects of Animal Welfare’, Acta polytechnika hungarica, 11(7), pp. 119-134; https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.11.07.2014.07.8.
Vinnari, E., Vinnari, M. (2022) ‘Making the invisibles visible: Including animals in sustainability (and) accounting’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 82, 102324; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102324.
Wilson, E. O. (1984) Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674045231.
CMS (1979) Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals [Online]. Available at: https://www.cms.int/sites/default/files/instrument/CMS-text.en_.PDF (Accessed: 14 March 2024).
CITES (2019) Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora [Online]. Available at: https://cites.org/sites/default/files/I/Brochure_UNEP_CITES_eng.pdf (Accessed: 14 March 2024).
Convention on Biological Diversity. (2011) [Online]. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf (Accessed: 14 March 2024).
UNESCO (1994) Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat [Online]. Available at: https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/current_convention_text_e.pdf (Accessed: 23 March 2024).
UN (1987) United Nations Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future [Online]. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf (Accessed: 22 August 2023).
UN (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [Online]. Available at: https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/application/pdf/conveng.pdf (Accessed:14 March 2024).
