Benefit-based accessibility models and reality
Keywords:
accessibility, benefit, internal migrationAbstract
The aim of our study was to ascertain how the internal migration in Hungary reflect the the utility based accessibility and how they differ from each other, what major trends can be detected? Before testing our hypothesis was that in Hungary the internal migration is especially in connection with the conditions of economic development.
This initial hypothesis was confirmed, since it seems clear link between the Hungarian internal migration and utility-based accessibility, that’s mean that the driving force in our country's internal migration is clearly linked to economic reasons.
References
Abraham, J. E. – Hunt, J. D. 2007 Random Utility Simulation Of Spatial Economics. Technical Paper No. TP-07009 Institute for Advanced Policy Research University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta Canada. p. 10.
Ben-Akiva, M. – Lerman, S.R. 1985 Discrete Choice Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bruinsma, F.R.–Rietveld, P. 1998 The Accessibility of European Cities: Theoretical Framework and Comparison of Approaches. In: Environment and Planning A 30. 499-521. o.
De Jong, G. – Pieters, M. – Daly, A. – Graafland, I. – Kroes, E.– Koopmans, C. 2005 Using the Logsum as an Evaluation Measure: Literature and Case Study. Report prepared for AVV Transport Research Centre p. 77. http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/2005/RAND_WR275.pdf
Espon 2003 Transport Services And Networks: Territorial Trends And Basic Supply Of Infrastructure For Territorial Cohesion. ESPON Project 1.2.1 Third interim report August 2003 http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/ThematicProjects/TransportTrends/3.ir_1.2.1-final.pdf
Fleischer, T. 2008 Az elérhetőség mérése, példákkal. KÖZÚTI ÉS MÉLYÉPÍTÉSI SZEMLE 58:(3-4) pp. 15-22. o.
Fleischer, T. 2008 Az elérhetőségről.: az elérhetőség fogalma. KÖZÚTI ÉS MÉLYÉPÍTÉSI SZEMLE 58:(1-2) pp. 1-6. o.
Geurs K. T – Ritsema van Eck J.R. 2001 Accessibility measures: review and applications. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use transportation scenarios, and related social and economic impact. Report no. 408505006 265 p. http://www.mnp.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/408505006.pdf
Hagerstrand, T. (1970): What about people in regional science? People of the Regional Science Association 24, 7–21.
Handy, S.L .– Niemeier, D.A. 1997 Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A 29, 1175–1194. o.
Levine, J. 1998 Rethinking accessibility and jobs-housing balance. Journal of American Planning Association 64 (2), 12–25. o.
Martellato, D.–Nijkamp, P.–Reggiani, A., 1995 Measurement and measures of network accessibility: economic perspectives. In: Button, K., Nijkamp, P., Priemus, H. (Eds.), Transport Networks in Europe: Concepts, Analysis and Policies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 161–179. o.
Martellato, D.–Nijkamp, P. 1998 The Concept of Accessibility Revisited. Accessibility, Trade and Locational Behaviour. Ashgate, Aldershot
Vickerman, R. 1998 Accessibility, Peripheriality and Spatial Development: The Question of Choice. Accessibility, Trade and Locational Behaviour. Ashgate, Aldershot
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Géza Tóth
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
