Social innovation and social learning in rural development
Keywords:
social innovation, social learning, reflexive agency, rural development, Bio-szentandrás, LEADERAbstract
This article explores, what is the role played by social innovation and social learning related to rural development policy and local development efforts; what content, conditions, and results may be important. Through two case studies we investigate, how local values and traditions may be dressed in today's robe in an innovative manner, utilized as a resource in development, and what is the role of "lonely heroes" as reflexive agents in the process.
References
Bíró, Sz. Nemes, G. (2014) Vidékfejlesztési támogatások, lehívások, eredmények Gazdálkodás, 2014/3, pp. 247-262.
EC, E. C. (2013). "Social innovation research in the European Union: approaches, findings and future directions." Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Eversole, R. (2011): Community Agency and Community Engagement: Re-theorising Participation in Governance. Journal of Public Policy, vol: 31 (01) pp: 51-71
High, C. – Singh, N. – Petheram, L. – Nemes, G. (2012)): Defining Participatory Video from Practice, In: Handbook of Participatory Video, Milne E, Mitchell, C. De Lange, N. (ed.) (2012) Handbook of Participatory Video, Altamira Press UK ISBN 978-0-7591-2113-3
Hooghe, L. and– Marks, G. (2003)): Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. Vienna Institute for Advanced Studies, 87 Reihe Politikwissenschaft Political Science Series, Vienna
Horváth Eszter, E. (2013): Kicsik között a legkisebbek – a törpefalvak sikerességének kulcstényezői, doktori disszertáció, Széchényi István Egyetem, Regionális- és Gazdaságtudományi Doktori Iskola, Győr p.205
Kozma, T., . –Teperics, K.,. – Erdei, G., and. – Tőzsér, Z. (2011).): A társadalmi tanulás mérése - egy határokon átnyúló térség (Bihar - Bihor Eurorégió) esete. Magyar Pedagógia, 111. évfolyam, pp. 189-206.
Marks, G. (1993)): Structural policy and multi-level governance in the European Community, In: The state of the European Community Boulder, Cafruny, A and Rosenthal,G (Eds.) The state of the European Community Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner pp. 391–411
Nemes, G. – High, C. – Augustyn, A. (2013): Beyond the New Rural Paradigm: Project state and collective reflexive agency, In.: Territorial Cohesion in Rural Europe: The Relational Turn in Rural Development (Regions and Cities), Copus, A. – De Lima, P. (Eds.), Routledge
Nemes, G. Fazekas, Zs. and Márquez, A.G. (2013) Vidékfejlesztés valódi decentralizációval - A LEADER Program megvalósítása Spanyolország Andalúzia tartományában, MTA KRTK KTI Discussion Papers, MT-DP - 2013/1 – Available at: http://econ.core.hu/file/download/mtdp/MTDP1301.pdf [Accessed on 22nd November 2013]
OECD (2006)): The new rural paradigm: policies and governance, in OECD Rural Policy Reviews, Paris: OECD Publications.
Reed, M. S., A. C.. – Evely, G.A. C. – Cundill, I.G. – Fazey, J.I. – Glass, A.J. – Laing, J.A. – Newig, B.J. – Parrish, C.B. – Prell, C. Raymond, and L. C. – Stringer. , L.C. (2010.): What is social learning? Ecology and Society 15(4): r1. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/
Thompson, G. (2003) Between hierarchies and markets: the logic and limits of network forms of organization, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press
Wenger, E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge University Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
