Bioeconomy starts Local – a Case study on Multi-Level Participative Governance and Circular Bioeconomy Development in Romania

Tihamér Tibor  Sebestyén

doi:10.32976/stratfuz.2024.42

Szerzők

Sebestyén Tihamér Tibor Sapientia Erdélyi Magyar Tudományegyetem

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32976/stratfuz.2024.42

Kulcsszavak:

circular bioeconomy, renewable energy, participatory governance, rural – urban economic relations

Absztrakt

This paper examines the implementation of a multi-level participative governance approach to address demographic change in rural areas, with a focus on the local rural municipality of Ghelinta. The paper will present through a case study approach, strategical responds on rural-urban challenges. The project responds to the rural exodus driven by better employment opportunities and prospects in urban areas were realized, resulting in depopulation and an aging, increasingly unskilled population in rural regions. Utilizing Circular-Bioeconomy as a tool for regional development, the Godanubio project fostered sustainable economic practices by transitioning from a fossil-resource-based economy to one that emphasizes biological resources and processes. This strategy aims to enhance value creation through new collaborations, business models, and value chains, thereby increasing the attractiveness of rural areas for young people.

In Ghelinta, several working group meetings were conducted, involving young citizens in participatory governance and developing the 2021-2030 Local Bioeconomy Development Strategy. The key objectives of this strategy include fostering cooperation among local stakeholders, involving young people in the decision-making process within the local council, creating new business ideas in the bioeconomy sector, improving public services for young people, and providing training on bioeconomy topics.

The overarching aims are to mitigate the gap between rural and urban areas, increase the visibility and attractiveness of rural areas through the development of the bioeconomy sector, and improve the overall well-being in rural regions. The long-term goal is to enhance the socio-economic status of these regions, contribute to environmental, climate, carbon sequestration and resource protection, and foster sustainable development (Sebestyen, 2024). This research highlights the importance of an ecosystem for systematic multi-level governance, engaging actors from the public, academia, industry, and political decision-making. By creating space for co-creation and integrated urban-rural cooperation, the project aims to increase institutional capacity to tackle demographic change and promote the active involvement of societal actors in the political system.

Információk a szerzőről

Sebestyén Tihamér Tibor, Sapientia Erdélyi Magyar Tudományegyetem

Assistant Professor – Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, Faculty of Life Science and Sport in Sfantu Gheorghe

Hivatkozások

Chatzichristos, G. (2023). Social Innovation in Rural Governance: A Comparative Case Study Across the Marginalised Rural EU. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.004

Adamowicz, M. (2021). The Potential for Innovative and Smart Rural Development in the Peripheral Regions of Eastern Poland. Agriculture, 11(3), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030188

Anon. (2023). Population Imbalances in Europe: Urban Concentration Versus Rural Depopulation. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 15, 713-716. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12670

Bara, A. (2023). How Fast to Avoid Carbon Emissions: A Holistic View on the RES, Storage, and Non-RES Replacement in Romania. Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 5115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065115

Brandao, M. (2022). Rural Regions as Key Locations for the Circular Bioeconomy: Insights from the Northern Interior of Portugal. Bioresource Technology Reports, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.100955

Castro-Arce, C. (2020). Transformative Social Innovation for Sustainable Rural Development: An Analytical Framework to Assist Community-Based Initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010

Cattaneo, M., et al. (2022). Economic and Social Development Along the Urban-Rural Continuum: New Opportunities to Inform Policy. World Development, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105941

Ciervo, F., et al. (2024). From "Bioeconomy Strategy" to the "Long-Term Vision" of European Commission: Which Sustainability for Rural Areas?. Journal of Geography. https://doi.org/10.4000/11rcj

Cristea, M. (2020). Measuring Romania’s Bioeconomy in the Context of EU Development Strategy. Annals of the "Constantin Brâncuşi" University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, Issue 5/2020

Cunha, C., et al. (2020). Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism: Do Lifestyle Motivations Contribute to Management Practices That Enhance Sustainable Entrepreneurial Ecosystems?. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.06.007

Diemer, M., et al. (2022). The Regional Development Trap in Europe. Economic Geography, 98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2022.2080655

Dumitru, D., et al. (2021). Sustainable Development of the Rural Areas from Romania: Development of a Digital Tool to Generate Adapted Solutions at Local Level. Sustainability, 13(21), 11921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111921

Fritsche, U., et al. (2020). Future Transitions for the Bioeconomy Towards Sustainable Development and a Climate-Neutral Economy. EC Knowledge Center for Bioeconomy, pp. 1-95

Giannakis, E., & Bruggeman, A. (2019). Regional Disparities in Economic Resilience in the European Union Across the Urban-Rural Divide. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1698720

Giurca, A., et al. (2022). Unlocking Romania's Forest-Based Bioeconomy Potential: Knowledge-Action-Gaps and the Way Forward. Land, 11(11), 2001. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11112001

Grignoli, D., et al. (2024). Vulnerability and Inner Areas in Italy—"Should Young Stay or Should Young Go"? A Survey in the Molise Region. Sustainability, 16, 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010359

Havadi, L. (2016). Entrepreneurship and Activation of Local Potential for Rural Development: Lemnia and Sâncrai - Two Case Studies from Romania. Territorial Identity and Development, 1, 7-22. https://doi.org/10.23740/TID120161

Havadi, L., et al. (2015). The Sustainable Development of Less-Favoured Areas: A Study of the Romanian and Austrian Experiences. Romanian Review of Regional Studies, 11(2)

Ionescu, A., et al. (2023). Regional Digital Economy in the Danube Member States Under the Impact of the New Challenges. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(2), 382-410. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.17897

Kardung, A., et al. (2021). Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators. Sustainability, 13(1), 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010413

Koev, K., et al. (2023). The Potential Risks for the Ecological and Social Security in the Danube Region and Their Overcoming in the Context of the New European Agenda. Journal of Danubian Studies and Research, 12(1). Retrieved from https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/JDSR/article/view/1989

Kostiukevych, I., et al. (2020). The Impact of European Integration Processes on the Investment Potential and Institutional Maturity of Rural Communities. Economics and Sociology, 13(3), 46-63. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-3/3

Lichtner, W. (2023). EU Strategy for the Danube Region: Multilevel Cooperation and Partnership Across Borders - Regional, Participatory, Direct. Der Donauraum, 62(3-4). https://doi.org/10.7767/dedo.2022.62.3-4.29

Mack, J., et al. (2020). Effects of EU Rural Development Funds on Newly Established Enterprises in Romania’s Rural Areas. European Planning Studies, 29(2), 291-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1746243

Maier, M., et al. (2019). Theory and Practice of European Co-operative Education and Training for the Support of Energy Transition. Energy Sustainability Society, 9, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-019-0213-4

Mantino, F., et al. (2021). Rural Areas Between Locality and Global Networks: Local Development Mechanisms and the Role of Policies Empowering Rural Actors. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-12364

Miller, D., et al. (2023). Empowering Rural Areas in Multi-Level Governance Processes. Rural Scotland and River Dee Catchment, SHERPA Horizon 2020 Project

Navarro-Valverde, J. (2022). Social Innovation in Rural Areas of the European Union: Learnings from Neo-Endogenous Development Projects in Italy and Spain. Sustainability, 14(11), 6439. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116439

Ronzon, T., et al. (2022). Has the European Union Entered a Bioeconomy Transition? Combining an Output-Based Approach with a Shift-Share Analysis. Environmental Development and Sustainability, 24, 8195-8217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01780-8

Sakellaris, I. (2021). Bioeconomy Education. In E. Koukios & A. Sacio-Szymańska (Eds.), Bio#Futures (pp. 22). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64969-2_22

Sebestyén, T., et al. (2019). The Establishment of a Micro-Scale Heat Market Using a Biomass-Fired District Heating System. Energy Sustainability and Society, 10, 25. (2020) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00257-2

Sebestyen, T. (2019). District Heating in Villages. In Y. Krozer & M. Narodoslawsky (Eds.), Economics of Bioresources: Concept, Tools, Experiences (pp. 125-134). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14618-4

Sebestyen, T. (2024). Evaluation of the Carbon Footprint of Wooden Glamping Structures by Life Cycle Assessment. Sustainability, 16, 2906. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072906

Stojanova, V., et al. (2022). Rural Digital Innovation Hubs as a Paradigm for Sustainable Business Models in Europe’s Rural Areas. Sustainability, 14(21), 14620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114620

Vaishar, A., et al. (2020). Is the European Countryside Depopulating? Case Study Moravia. Journal of Rural Studies, 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.044

Voicilas, D. (2023). Is Romania Prepared for the National Bioeconomy Strategy?. Institute of Agricultural Economics, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania. https://doi.org/10.59277/AERD.2023.2.06

Yin, Z., et al. (2022). Rural Innovation System: Revitalize the Countryside for a Sustainable Development. Journal of Rural Studies, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.014