Consistency improvement and normalisations in multi-criteria decision support methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32972/dms.2025.008Kulcsszavak:
multi-criteria decision making, engineering design, VIKOR, TOPSIS, AHPAbsztrakt
Optimisation problems in mechanical engineering often involve several conflicting objectives and require multi-purpose optimisation (MOO) to solve. The solution of MOO problems is a set of equally good optimal solutions, which are called Pareto-optimal solutions. In order to choose one of the Pareto-optimal solutions, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is required.
Hivatkozások
Crawford, G., & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29(4), 387-405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(85)90002-1
Frish, S., Talmor, I., Hadar, O., Shoshany, M., & Shapira, A. (2025). Enhancing consistency of AHP-based expert judgements: A new approach and its implementation in an interactive tool. MethodsX, 14, 103341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103341
Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Introduction. 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_1
Perron, O. (1907). Zur Theorie der Matrices. Mathematische Annalen, 64(2), 248-263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01449896
Saaty, T. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Saaty, T. (1979, 1). Optimization by the Analytic Hierarchy Process. doi:https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA214804 Salomon, V., & Gomes, L. (2024). Consistency Improvement in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematics, 12(6), 828. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/math12060828
Wang, Z., Nabavi, S., & Rangaiah, G. (2023). Selected Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods and Their Applications to Product and System Design. Optimization Methods for Product and System Design, 107-138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1521-7_7
