The procedural legal status of migrants transported by smugglers in European jurisprudence

Authors

  • Anna Kiss Senior researcher at National Institute of Criminology, Hungary
  • Szandra Windt Senior researcher at National Institute of Criminology, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46941/2024.se1.4

Keywords:

migrant smuggling, victim, witness, criminal procedure, administrative offence, Legicoop, Eurojust

Abstract

In this paper, we present the approach of criminology and criminal procedure law to migrant smuggling, a phenomenon that is also significant at the European level. The characteristics of migrant smuggling as defined by the UN Protocol are presented, followed by the responses at the European level and the most recent statistics. The procedural status of smuggled persons, their status as victims, witnesses or perpetrators (suspected or accused), and the approach taken by the different branches of law are also discussed. After that, we summarize the results of our research conducted in the spring of 2024 with the cooperation of EUROJUST and Legicoop members. The following research questions were formulated, concerning the procedural status of migrants transported by smugglers in their countries

 In criminal cases of migrant smuggling, what is the procedural position of the person transported by the migrant smuggler? (victim, witness, instigator, abettor)
 Are there any individual criminal proceedings or other (i.e. administrative, misdemeanour) procedures against the person transported by the migrant smuggler?
In most European countries, migrants are considered victims of migrant smuggling and in the criminal proceedings that have been initiated, they take the position of victims: at most they are questioned as witnesses. Due to illegal border crossing, no separate criminal proceedings are usually initiated against them, most of the time these cases are resolved within the framework of public administrative proceedings.

References

Bartkó, R. (2024) ‘Recent Changes in Hungarian Criminal Legislation to Address Irregular Migration’, IZA Journal of Development and Migration, March 2024 (15), pp. 31-41; https://doi.org/10.62693/863rpl86q.

Bast, J., Endres de Oliveira, P., Wessels, J. (2023) ‘Enhancing the Rights of Protection-Seeking Migrants through the Global Compact for Migration: The Case of EU Asylum Policy’, International Journal of Refugee Law, 35(4), pp. 461–474; https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eead007.

Campana, P. (2018) ‘Out of Africa: The organization of migrant smuggling across the Mediterranean’, European Journal of Criminology, 15(4), pp. 481-502; https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817749179.

Comparing Notes: Perspectives on Human Smuggling in Austria, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands (2006), International Migration, 44(4), pp. 39-58; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2006.00379.x.

Eurojust (2023) Eurojust Annual Report 2023. [Online]. Available at: https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/sites/default/files/assets/eurojustannual-report-2023-en.pdf (Accessed: 1 February 2024).

Eurojust (2024) Legal definition of migrant smuggling and/or facilitation of irregular migration an overview of EU legislation. [Online]. Available at:

https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/sites/default/files/assets/legaldefinition-of-migrant-smuggling-and-facilitation-of-irregularmigration.pdf (Accessed: 1 February 2024).

Europol (2022) European Migrant Smuggling Centre - 6th Annual Report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. [Online]. Available at: https://www.europol.europa.eu/publicationsevents/publications/european-migrant-smuggling-centre-6th-annualreport-%E2%80%93-2022. (Accessed: 1 February 2024).

Farkas, Á., Jánosi, A. (2013) ‘A bizonyítás kérdései a határokon átnyúló bűncselekmények vonatkozásában az Európai Unióban’ Miskolci Doktoranduszok Jogtudományi Tanulmányai Studia Iurisprudentiae Doctorandorum Miskolciensium, 13(12), pp. 79-94.

Hautzinger, Z. (2019) ‘Migratory Impacts on Law Enforcement.’ in Hautzinger, Z. (ed.) Dynamics and Social Impact of Migration. Budapest: Dialóg Campus.

Kara Á., Kiss A., Sárik E., Szentmihályi-Soós, V. (2020) ‘Victimology in Hugary’ in Meško, G., Sárik, E., Getoš Kalac A. M. (eds.) Mapping the Victimological Landscape of the Balkans. A Regional Study on Victimology and Victim Protection with a Critical Analysis of Current Victim Policies, pp. 303-341. [Online]. Available at:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354342922_Mapping_the_Victimological_Landscape_of_the_Balkans_A_Regional_Study_on_Victimology_and_Victim_Protection_with_a_Critical_Analysis_of_Current_Victim_Policies (Accessed: 1 February 2024).

Mitsilegas, V. (2019) ‘The normative foundations of the criminalization of human smuggling: Exploring the fault lines between European and international law.’ New Journal of European Criminal Law, 10(1), pp. 68-85; https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284419834363.

Schloenhardt, A., Hickson, H. (2013) ‘Non-Criminalization of Smuggled Migrants: Rights, Obligations, and Australian Practice under Article 5 of the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea, and Air.’ International Journal of Refugee Law, 25(1), pp. 39–64; https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eet003.

Staiano, F. (2022) Transnational Organized Crime: Challenging International Law Principles on State Jurisdiction. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800888364.

van der Woude, M., van der Leun, J. (2017). ‘Crimmigration checks in the internal border areas of the EU: Finding the discretion that matters’, European Journal of Criminology, 14(1), pp. 27-45; https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370816640139.

Zsirai, V. (2019) ‘Az illegális be- és átvándorlás segítése – az embercsempészés bűncselekménye’. Ügyészek Lapja, 26(1), pp. 35-45.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-14

How to Cite

Kiss, A., & Windt, S. (2024). The procedural legal status of migrants transported by smugglers in European jurisprudence. European Integration Studies, 20(1 (spec. edition), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.46941/2024.se1.4