Environmental damage, climate change and the precautionary principle from an ethical perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46941/2025.se1.15Kulcsszavak:
precautionary principle, climate change, environmental ethics, risk assessment, uncertainty.Absztrakt
Preventing major damage or a disaster usually requires action before damage occurs, especially if this damage would be irreversible. The precautionary principle is central to environmental and climate issues, but has only recently become more important, for example as one of the four fundamental principles of the European Union. With regard to the precautionary principle, the open flanks and possible areas of dispute that characterise the debates on this principle are shown from an ethical perspective.
Firstly, the scope of the precautionary principle has expanded and with it the goods worthy of protection. Secondly, potential risks in many different areas need to be identified or researched - with the help of an interdisciplinary approach. Fourthly, the risks must be assessed in relation to ethical and legal norms. Psychological pitfalls must be avoided in the assessment. Fourthly, precautionary measures must be discussed in terms of their effectiveness and priority in view of other areas of risk.
Hivatkozások
Ach, J. S., Borchers, D. (eds.) (2018) Handbuch Tierethik. Grundlagen – Kontexte – Perspektiven, Stuttgart: Metzler; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05402-9.
Adhikari, S., Lutz, W. (2024) ‘Forecasting Africa’s Fertility Decline by Female Education Groups’, PNAS, 121(46), e2320247121; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2320247121.
Basaglia, F. (2018) ’Kantische Ansätze’ in Ach, J. S., Borchers, D. (eds.) Handbuch Tierethik. Grundlagen – Kontexte – Perspektiven, Stuttgart: Metzler, pp. 89-94; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05402-9_15.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.
Bobbert, M. (2012) Ärztliches Urteilen bei entscheidungsunfähigen Schwerkranken, Geschichte – Theorie – Ethik, Münster: Mentis; https://doi.org/10.30965/9783957439567.
Bobbert, M. (2017) ‘Ethical Criteria of Treatment Decision Making for Cancer Patients no Longer able to Give Consent’, in Bobbert, M., Herrmann, B., Eckart, W. U. (eds.) Ethics and Oncology, Freiburg/Br: Albers, pp. 121-132; https://doi.org/10.5771/9783495813430-121.
Bobbert, M. (2015) Urteile in der (Bio-)Medizin- und Pflegeethik sind „gemischte“ Urteile, in Ammicht Quinn, R., Potthast, T. (eds.) Ethik in den Wissenschaften, Tübingen: IZEW, pp. 299-306.
Bohannon, J. (2002) ‘Zambia Rejects GM Corn on Scientist´s Advice’, Science, 298(5596), pp. 1153-1154; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5596.1153a.
Dietrich, J., Lutz, R., Hilscher, M., Manoharan, D., Matute Giron, I., Mauser, J., Schweizer, S., Bellows, A. C. (2012) ‘The Ethical Matrix as an Instrument for Teaching and Evaluation’, in Potthast, T., Meisch, S. (eds.) Climate Change and Sustainable Development: Ethical Perspectives on Land Use and Food Production. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 511-516; https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-753-0_78.
Dietrich, J. (2008) Ungewissheit in der ethischen Urteilsbildung – ein Überblick in Thomas, P., Benk, A. (eds.), Negativität und Orientierung, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 65-78.
Düwell, M. (2008) Bioethik. Methoden, Theorien und Bereiche, Stuttgart: Metzler; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05008-3.
Edenhofer, O., Jakob, M. (2019) Klimapolitik, München: C.H. Beck, 2. Aufl. (1. Aufl. 2017); https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406736162-2.
Engels, J. I. (2006) ‘Naturpolitik in der Bundesrepublik. Ideenwelt und politische Verhaltensstile in Naturschutz und Umweltbewegung‘ pp. 1950-1980, Paderborn: Schöningh.
Heath, V. (2025) Lithium: the ‘White Gold’ Powering the World in Geographical 17.02.2025 [Online]. Available at: https://geographical.co.uk/science-environment/lithium-the-white-gold-powering-the-world (Accessed: 11 June 2025).
Lintner, M. (2017) Der Mensch und das liebe Vieh: Ethische Fragen im Umgang mit Tieren. Innsbruck: Tyrolia.
Lutz, W. (2011) ‘Wachstum der Weltbevölkerung: Bildung der Frauen entscheidend‘, Demografische Forschung, 8(4), pp. 1-2.
Ostnor, L. (ed.) (2008) Stem Cells, Human Embryos and Research. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer.
Petrus, K. (2018) ‘Rechte-Ansatz’, in Ach, J. S., Borchers, D. (eds.) Handbuch Tierethik. Grundlagen – Kontexte – Perspektiven, Stuttgart: Metzler, pp. 83-88.
Sunstein C. R. (2005) Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790850.
Sunstein, C. R. (2001) Probability Neglect: Emotions, Worst Cases, and Law in Chicago Working Papers in Law and Economics, University of Chicago Law School, pp. 1-35. [Online]. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1384&context=law_and_economics (Accessed: 11 June 2025); https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.292149.
Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Umweltbundesamt, Vorsorgeprinzip, 21.0.1.2021: [Online]. Available at: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/vorsorgeprinzip (Accessed: 11 June 2025).
Deutscher Bundestag, 09.06.2021, Drucksache 19/30505. Das Gesetz über die unternehmerischen Sorgfaltspflichten in Lieferketten (LKG) wurde 11.06.2021 verabschiedet und trat am 01.01.2023 in Kraft. [Online]. Available at: https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/19/305/1930505.pdf (Accessed: 11 June 2025).
European Commission (2025) Principles of EU-Environmental Law. [Online]. Available at: https://www.era comm.eu/Introduction_EU_Environmental_Law/EN/module_2/module_2_10.html (Accessed: 11 June 2025).
European Parliament, Fact Sheets on the European Union, Environment Policy: General Principles and Basic Framework. [Online]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/erpl-app-public/factsheets/pdf/en/FTU_2.5.1.pdf (Accessed: 11 June 2025).
European Union (2019) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Comittee of the Regions, The European Green Deal, COM/2019/640 final, Document 52019DC0640. [Online]. Available at: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640 (Accessed: 11 June 2025).
European Union (2000) Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle, document 52000DC0001, COM/2000/0001 final. [Online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52000DC0001 (Accessed: 11 June 2025).
European Union, Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on Corporate Sustainability due Diligence and Amending. [Online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj (Accessed: 11 June 2025).
European Union, European Environment Agency (2001) Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Environmental Issue Report No 22 01/2001, Copenhagen. [Online]. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/environmental_issue_report_2001_22 (Accessed: 11 June 2025).
European Union, European Environment Agency (2001) Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Environmental Issue Report No 22 01/2001, Copenhagen. [Online]. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/environmental_issue_report_2001_22 (Accessed: 11 June 2025).
United Nations General Assembly (1992), Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I), Principle 15. [Online]. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf (Accessed: 11 June 2025).
