Regional development policy in Romania, in the light of the 2007-2013 programming period
Keywords:
Romania, regionalization, spending of structural and cohesion fundsAbstract
In Romania the regional development policy in present in the public debate almost exclusively in relation to the spending of structural and cohesion fonds. Journalists, politicians and experts are trying in a more or less coherent mode to offer cause-effect explanations. The present study tries to undergo this topic in a scientific manner, embedding the process of Romanian regionalization in a historical perspective. It analyses as well the roots of the problems related to the actual programming period and seeks for future possibilities of adjustment.
References
Bache, I. (2010): "Europeanization and multi-level governance: EU cohesion policy and pre-accession aid in Southeast Europe." Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 10(1): pp. 1-12.
Benedek, J. (2009): The Emergence of New Regions in Transition Romania. De-coding New Regionalism. W. J. Scott. Burlington, ASHGATE.
Blomeyer&Sanz (2011): Pre-accesion financing for Bulgaria and Romania: What lessons can be learned for future enlargements? Brussels, European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies.
Brusis, M., Ochmann, C.,, Ed. (1996): Central and Eastern Europe on the way into the European Union: 1996 report on the state of readiness for integration Central and Eastern Europe on the Way into the European Union: Problems and Prospects of Integration in 1996, Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers.
Dabrowski, M. (2008): "Structural funds as a driver for institutional change in Poland." Europe-Asia Studies 60(2): pp. 227-248.
Dincă, D. (2005): "Deconcentrarea serviciilor publice." Cadran politic 25.
Horváth, G. (2007). The dilemmas of creating regions in Eastern and Central Europe. East Central European Regional Seminar. A. D. Kovacs. Pecs, Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences Regionality and/or locality: pp. 13-28
Institutul de Politici Publice (2011): Fondurile Structurale - de la oportunitate de dezvoltare la buget de pradă. Bucuresti.
Institutul de Politici Publice (2012): Analiză Naţională - Capacitatea şi implicarea administraţiei publice locale în absorbţia durabilă a banilor europeni pentru dezvoltarea comunităţilor din România.
KPMG (2011): EU Funds in Central and Eastern Europe. Progress Report 2007-2010. KPMG. Budapest, KPMG's Public Sector.
Liesbet, H., Ed. (1996): Cohesion Policy and European Integration. Building Multi-Level Governance New York, Oxford University Press.
Milio, S. (2007): "Can Administrative Capacity Explain Differences in Regional Performances? Evidence from Structural Funds Implementation in Southern Italy." Regional Studies 41(4): pp. 429-442.
Nistor, I. S. (2000): Comuna si judetul. Evolutia istorica. Bucuresti, Ed. Dacia.
OECD (2007). Linking regions and central governments: contracts for regional development. Paris, OECD.
Pálné Kovács, I. (2001): Regionális politika és közigazgatás. Budapest-Pécs, Dialóg Campus Kiadó.
Săgeată, R. D. (2004). Modele de regionare politico-administrativă. Bucureşti, Editura TOP FORM.
Schwab, K., Sala-i-Martin, Xavier and F. World Economic (2011): The global competitiveness report 2011-2012. Geneve, World Economic Forum.
Stanculescu, M., D. Jula, et al. (2002): Impactul politicii de coeziune socială asupra dezvoltării economico-sociale la nivel regional în România. I. E. d. România. Bucureşti, Institutul European din România.
Zöld Könyv (1997): A regionális fejlesztéspolitika Romániában. PHARE Program, Románia Kormánya és az Európai Bizottság.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
