Where are the borders of good state? Ideas based on the article titled: “Defining the state audit’s monitoring aspects and focus areas of the state’s market regulating activity”
Köllödné –Vargha -Pulay (2016): Defining the state audit’s monitoring aspects and focus areas of the state’s market regulating activity. https://www.asz.hu/storage/files/files/Publikaciok/Elemzesek_tanulmanyok/2016/piacszerv_tanulmany.pdf?ctid=976
Keywords:
audit, good state, public service, market regulationAbstract
The Hungarian state has undertaken several new tasks after 2010. It organize the public education, the water management, the mass transportation through auto buses, the chimney-sweeping, the school book allocation, and the tobacco commerce in a new organizational and responsibility structure, only mentioning some of the most sensible questions for the citizens.
The change of the state’s engagement has appeared in the national public policy debates in a special ideological frame. The basic question of this ideological frame whether the stronger engagement of the state into the market relations can be verified, and is effective. The State Audit Office of Hungary has made on attempt in his article to analyse the after 2010 more dominant new forms of state engagement in market regulation in connection with the historical forms of state activity, and to give aspects for the evaluation of public finances applied for these activities.
References
BARRON, G. (2005): The World Bank & Rule of Law Reforms, Working Paper Series No. 05-07. Development Studies Institute London School of Economics and Political Science.
BOHLE, D./GRESKOVITS, B. (2007): Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism, and neocorporatism: Paths towards transnational capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe. West European Politics, 30 (3):pp.443-66.
BÖRÖCZ J. (1995): Színlelt nagy átalakulás? Informális kiút az államszocializmusból. In: Politikatudományi Szemle, Vol. 4., No. 3. pp.19–41.
BUSSIÈRE, M./PÉREZ-BARREIRO, E./STRAUB, R./TAGLIONI, D. (2010): Protectionist Responses to the Crisis: Global Trends and Implications Occasional Paper Series 110, European Central Bank.
DOMOKOS L. (2014): Az Állami Számvevőszék munkája és az adósságszabály (1), Pénzügyi Szemle Online, http://www.penzugyiszemle.hu/tanulmanyok-eloadasok/az-allami-szamvevoszek-munkaja-es-az-adossagszabaly 1
HIRT, S./SELLAR, C./YOUNG C. (2013): Neoliberal Doctrine Meets the Eastern Bloc: Resistance, Appropriation, and Purification in Post-socialist Spaces., Europe-Asia Studies 65(7): pp.1243.
KORNAI, J. (2006): The Great Transformation of Central Eastern Europe: Success and disappointment. Economics of Transition 14(2). pp. 207–244.
LAZARUS, J. (2013): Democracy or Good Governance? Globalization, Transnational Capital, and Georgia's Neo-liberal Revolution. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, Vol.7, Iss. 3.
MAGYARY Z. (1942): Magyar Közigazgatás, a közigazgatás szerepe a XX. sz. államában, a magyar közigazgatás szervezete működése és jogi rendje. Királyi Magyar Egyetemi Nyomda, Budapest.
PIJL, VAN DER, K. (1998): Transnational Classes and International Relations. Routledge, London and New York.
POGÁTSA Z. (2016): Magyarország politikai gazdaságtana: Az északi modell esélyei. Osiris Kiadó, Budapest.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.