Exploring the Enforcement of the Right to Resist in the 19th Century Natural Law Theory

Authors

  • Anna Petrasovszky Associate professor, Institute of Legal History and Jurisprudence, Department of Legal History, Faculty of Law, University of Miskolc, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46941/2023.e2.11

Keywords:

natural law, Hungarian natural-law literature, citizen's and public authority's rights and obligations, enforcing rights, form of rights to resist, principles of gradation and proportionality, tyrannical exercise of State power

Abstract

Studies on natural law carrying the more moderate spirit of the Enlightenment promoted the establishment of civil society, humanity, and equity, and by the turn of the 18th and 19th centuries, created a synthesis of the views of Pufendorf, Leibniz, Thomasius, Wolff, and Kant, which reflected the state and legal systems. Although the sovereignty of the state and the nature of its maxima societas remains unquestionable, governance can be subject to criticism. Executive power can only be exercised under the law, and if not, citizens may use various means of their right to resistance, observing the principle of gradation and proportionality. This study demonstrates the applicability of these tools to the interpretation of natural law in the 19th century.

References

Martini, C. A. (1795) De lege naturali positiones, Positiones de iure civitatis. Buda.

Molnár, A. (1881) A közoktatás története Magyarországon a XVIII. században. Budapest: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia.

Kornis, Gy. (1927) A magyar művelődés eszményei 1777-1848. Vol. I., Budapest: Királyi Magyar Egyetemi Nyomda.

Hamza, G. (2002) Az európai magánjog fejlődése, Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.

Pauler, T. (1878) Adalékok a hazai jogtudomány történetéhez. Budapest: A Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvkiadó Vállalata.

Szabadfalvi, J. (2011) A magyar jogbölcseleti gondolkodás kezdetei, Werbőczy Istvántól Somló Bódogig. Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó.

Szabadfalvi, J. (2010) The Beginnings of Hungarian Legal Philosophical Thinking, ARSP: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 96(3).

Virozsil, A. (1833) Jus naturae privatum, methodo critica deductum ab Antonio Virozsil. Pesthini.

Zeiller, F. N. (1819) Jus naturae privatum. Viennae: Editio Germanica tertia Latine reddita a Francisco Nobili de Egger.

Szibenliszt, M. (1820) Institutiones juris naturalis conscriptae per Michaelem Szibenliszt, Tomus I. Jus naturae extrasociale complectens. Jaurini.

Szibenliszt, M. (1821) Institutiones juris naturalis conscriptae per Michaelem Szibenliszt, Tomus II. Jaurini.

Zeiller, F., Egger, F. (1810) Das natürliche öffentliche Recht, nach den Lehrsätzen des seligen Freyhern C. A. von Martini vom Staatsrechte, mit bestän. diger Rücksicht auf das natürliche Privat-Recht. Wien und Triest.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-18

How to Cite

Petrasovszky, A. (2024). Exploring the Enforcement of the Right to Resist in the 19th Century Natural Law Theory. European Integration Studies, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.46941/2023.e2.11

Issue

Section

Articles - Section II.