The two meanings of the deditio in the roman law

Authors

  • Bajánházy István PhD egyetemi docens Miskolci Egyetem ÁJK Jogtörténeti és Jogelméleti Intézet Római Jogi Intézeti Tanszék

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32978/sjp.2020.027

Keywords:

Roman law, deditio, fetiales, Pomponius, Modestinus, Titus Livius, M. Tullius Cicero

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show the two meaning of the Latin word deditio. The first meaning was used in the international relations of the Roman State and meant of the surrender and it was set by question-answer (contractual) form. The other meaning was the deliver of the Roman citizen to the enemy. We can find two groups of them in the sources: first was the deliver of a common citizen who committed offence against the ambassadors of the enemy, the second was the delivery of a formal general, how made an unwarranted peace-treaty. Both cases based on the offence against the Roman sovereignty. In the later
one the main question was, whether the delivered person, who have been not accepted by the enemy and after returned to Rome, can recover his former rights automatically or not. There were two different standpoints for that: the first and main said, he lost his citizenship by the decision-making, because it was a legal punishment. By the second however: the person lost his citizenship only by the acceptance by the enemy, without this he remained a Roman citizen. In the Mancinus-case we can observe both point of views in the sentences of jurists, but the former was the acceptable in this case as well.

References

BENEDEK Ferenc – PÓKECZ-KOVÁCS Attila: Római magánjog. Budapest–Pécs, Ludovika Egyetemi Kiadó, 2020.

FÖLDI András – HAMZA Gábor: A római jog története és institúciói. Oktatási Hivatal, Budapest, 2020.

Max KASER: „Ius publicum” und „ius privatum”. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Romanistische Abteilung (ZSS) 103 (1986), 1–101.

Max KASER: Ius gentium. Böhlau Verlag, Köln–Weimar–Wien, 1993.

Detlef LIEBS: Bellum iustum in Theorie und Praxis. In: Ars Juris – Festschrift für Okko Behrends zum 70. Geburtstag, (Hrsg.: Martin Averanius – Rudolf Mayer-Pritzl – Cosima Müller), Wallstein Verlag, Göttingen, 2009, 305–318.

Joachim MARQUARDT: Römische Staatsverwaltung. Verlag von S. Hirzel, Leipzig, 1876.

Theodor MOMMSEN: Römisches Strafrecht. Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, 1955.

NÓTÁRI Tamás: Festuca autem utebatur quasi hastae loco. Acta Fac. Pol-Iur. Univ. 41 (2004), Budapest, 133–162.

NÓTÁRI Tamás: Római köz- és magánjog. Szeged, Lectum Kiadó, 2011.

PÓKECZ-KOVÁCS Attila: A királyság és a köztársaság közjogi intézményei Rómában. Dialóg Campus Kiadó, Budapest–Pécs, 2014.

Giovanni ROTONDI: Leges publicae populi romani. Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim–Zürich–New York, 1990.

Karl-Heinz ZIEGLER: Das Völkerrecht der römischen Republik, ANRW II., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin–New York, 1972, 68–114.

ZLINSZKY János: Állam és jog az ősi Rómában. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 1996.

ZLINSZKY János: Ius publicum – Római közjog. Osiris–Századvég, Budapest, 1994.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-19

How to Cite

Bajánházy, I. (2022). The two meanings of the deditio in the roman law. Publicationes Universitatis Miskolcinensis Sectio Juridica Et Politica, 38(2.), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.32978/sjp.2020.027

Issue

Section

THEORETICAL AND HISTORICAL STUDIES