Recent questions of the Brussels I Regulation in the light of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32980/MJSz.2023.1.158Keywords:
special jurisdiction, jurisdiction over consumer contracts, place where the damage occurred, place of the event giving rise to damageAbstract
Although the Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters has been in force for more than seven years, many questions on its application are still being raised before the Court of Justice of the European Union. This paper describes the most important decisions of the Court of Justice in relation to the interpretation of the Regulation with reference to its scope and jurisdiction rules, especially the special and exclusive jurisdiction rules in case of contractual and tort law cases.
References
Tímár Kinga: Immunitás és joghatóság az Európai Bíróság aktuális gyakorlatában, ELTE folyóiratok, Jogi Tanulmányok. Magánjogi Szekció. 2010. 14. évf. 3. sz. 53. o.
Bartóki-Gönczy Balázs: Joghatósági kérdések az interneten elkövetett személyiségi jogi jogsértések esetén, In Medias Res 2012/1, 93-99.
Defamation: Is a Significant Shift in the Criteria for Determining Jurisdiction at EU level on the Way?.
Fabrizio Marongiu Buonaiuti: Jurisdiction Concerning Actions by a Legal Person for Disparaging Statements on the Internet: The Persistence of the Mosaic Approach. European Papers, Vol. 7, 2022, No 1, European Forum, Insight of 29 June 2022, pp. 345-360 https://www.europeanpapers.eu/es/europeanforum/jurisdiction-concerning-actions-by-legal-person-for-disparaging-statements-on-internet-mosaic-approach
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
