Telekommunikációs eszközök alkalmazása a büntetés-végrehajtásban

Anita Nagy

doi:10.32980/MJSz.2025.3.268

Authors

Anita Nagy Egyetemi tanár, Miskolci Egyetem, Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar, Büntető Eljárásjogi és Büntetés- végrehajtási Jogi Intézeti Tanszék

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32980/MJSz.2025.3.268

Keywords:

remote hearing, E -criminal cases, criminal enforcement law, electronic monitoring

Abstract

In my study I examine the presentation of telecommunication devices, so in addition to the remote hearing of the court stage and I also examine the Hungarian and international aspects of electronic remote hearing in criminal enforcement law. Considering the essence of the institutional system, the goal is that the technical device can be used at any stage of the procedure, thus in relation to any person participating in the criminal proceeding and for the entire duration of any procedural act, as well as in the criminal enforcement law. At the end of the study I discuss the electronic monitoring introduced in 2017 as an electronic devices also, both in Hungarian and internationally aspects.

References

Bogotyán Róbert: Telekommunikációs eszközök alkalmazása a büntetés-végrehajtásban Börtönügyi Szemle 2018.évi 4. szám 19. oldal.

Schäffner, C., Kredens, K., & Fowler, Y. (Eds.). (2013). Interpreting in a Changing Landscape: Selected Papers from Critical Link 6 (Vol. 109). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.109

Bowcott, O. (2017): Videolinks in court trials undermine justice system, says report. Online: https:// www.theguardian.com/law/2017/oct/23/videolinks-in-court-trials-undermine-justice-systemsays-report

Schmehl János: Az új szabályozás főbb szakmai elemei és üzenetei. Börtönügyi Szemle, 2013/4., 21.

HM Courts & Tribunals Service, Ministry of Justice. (2018). Video hearing pilot launched. Online: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/video-hearing-pilot-launched

Fowler, Y. (2007). Interpreting into the ether: interpreting for prison/court video link hearings. In Proceedings of the Critical Link 5 conference, Sydney, 11-15/04/2007.

Gibbs, P. (2017). Defendants on video- conveyor belt justice or a revolution in access? Online: https:// www.barrowcadbury.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/TJ_Disconnected.pdf

Faller, K. C. & Vandervort, F. (2012). What works in child welfare. Online: https://cacnc.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/Powerpoint-on-protecting-child-witnesses-in-court-mental-healthissues-and-legal-provisions.pdf Faller,

Brett, A., & Blumberg, L. (2006). Video-linked court liaison services: forging new frontiers in psychiatry in Western Australia. Australasian Psychiatry, 14(1), 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1665.2006.02236.x

Ryan, P., Evers, M., (2016): Exploring eCourt innovations in New South Wales civil courts. Online: https://kanizsaujsag.hu/hir/201811/szazezreket-milliokat-sporolhat-a-birosag-az-allamnaka-tavmeghallgatassal/

Pinto, Susana – Nellis, Mike: Survey of Electronic Monitoring in Europe, Analysis of Questionnaires.2012,2–3. http://www.coe.int/t/DGHL/STANDARDSETTING/PRISONS/PCCP%20documents%202013/Analysis%20questionnaires%202012.pdf (megtekintés ideje: 2015.december 1.)

Elektronische Fußfesseln: Österreich testet in einem Pilotversuch den Einsatz elektronischer Fußfesseln für Gefangene. NJW-Spezial 2006, 92. Idézi Mohácsi Barbara: A szabadságvesztés-büntetés lehetséges „alternatívái”, Jogi tanulmányok, Az Eötvös Lorand Tudományegyetem Állam-és Jogtudományi Doktori Iskolájának folyóirata, 2010.I.kötet 368.

Weichert, Thilo: Der elektronische Hausarrest aus Sicht des Datenschutzes. StV, 2000, 335–339.