New Model of Current Account Balances
Keywords:
current account balance, current account turnover, corporate financeAbstract
Managing current account balances – defining the value of the necessary closing level – is perhaps the most exciting daily routine
activity of corporate financial managers. The relevant discussion of this subject in Corporate Finance by Brealey and Myers, one of
the most popular manuals of today’s higher education in finances, refers to research conducted over 60 years ago. This manual
applies the Baumol model to current account balance management, starting from the costs of simple inventory management. An
enhancement of the above is the Miller-Orr model, which restricts the volatility of the cash balances between an upper and the lower
limit, and defines the value at one-third as the return point.
Our globalised world is characterized by electronic banking, which has fundamentally changed the entire system of finances.
Research done on figures of the 2000s led to results that were different than before. According to new findings, in modern
accelerated cash management the level of current account balances is not determined by the assumed “inventory management costs”
(through the development of electronic methods, they have decreased drastically, anyhow), rather the habits of cash transaction
management.
References
BAUMOL, W. J. (1952): “The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66, pp. 545-556.
BREALEY, R. A. – MYERS, S. C. (1998): Modern vállalati pénzügyek, Panem-McGraw-Hill, Budapest Corporate current account analyses of Data Explorer Kft. 2002. (unpublished)
FOGARAS, I., (Ed.) (1997): Bankmenedzsment, A bankvezetés gyakorlata, SALDO, Budapest
KOVÁCS, L. (1999): „A vállalati folyószámlák kamatozásának elméleti vizsgálata”, Bankszemle, 1999/7, pp. 50-58.
KOVÁCS, L. (2002): „Mibe kerül a cash-menedzsment?”, Bank & Tőzsde, 2002/12, p. 17.
MILLER, H. – ORR, D. (1966): “A Model of the Demand for Money by Firms”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80. pp. 413-435.
(The author used some additional publications of his without reference.)