Winners and Losers in the Liberalized Energy Retail Sector in Hungary: A Co-evolutionary Approach
Keywords:
Business/Government Interaction and Relations, Institutional trajectories, Market liberalization, Energy, Central and Eastern EuropeAbstract
This paper examines the recent history of the Hungarian energy trading market in a co-evolutionary framework. Hungary is characterized by a mixed ownership structure with mainly multinational incumbents in energy retail and distribution, while the wholesale is dominantly owned by state-owned companies. The legal framework also has dual characteristics, with free-market regulation for industrial consumers and a regulated price regime for households. Our research method follows a longitudinal approach from the period of market liberalization in 2008 until 2013. We identified strong relationship between the individual and sector performance of the trading companies and the current political ideology and institutional regime.
References
BARNEY, J. B. & ARIKAN, A. M. (2001): The Resource-based View: Origins and Implications.In Hitt M. A., Freeman R. E. & Harrison J. S. (Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management.(pp. 124-187). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
BIRKINSHAW, J.M., YOUNG S. &HOOD,N. (2004). Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, 14: 227-248.
CEER (2012).CEER Status Review of Customer and Retail Market Provisions from the 3rd Package as of 1 January 2012. Council of European Energy Regulators, C12-CEM-55-04. Brussels, 7 November 2012.
CHILD, J., RODRIGUES, S. B. &TSE, K-T. K. (2012): The Dynamics of Influence in Corporate Co-Evolution.Journal of Management Studies, Volume 49, Issue 7: 1246–1273.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2008): Commission requests Hungary to end long-term power purchase agreements and recover state aid from power generators. Press Release, IP/08/850. European Commission,Brussels, 4 June 2008.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2009a): Directive 2009/72/ECof the European Parliament and of the Councilof13 July 2009concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, 14.8.2009.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2009b): Directive 2009/73/ECof the European Parliament and of the Councilof13 July 2009concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, 14.8.2009.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2014): Energy prices and costs report. Comission Staff Working Document, SWD(2014) 20 final/2. European Commission, Brussels, 17 March.
FOXON, T. J. (2011): A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecological Economics, Vol. 70: 2258-2267.
GRANT, ROBERT M. (2008): Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Sixth Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
HANNON M. J., FOXON T. J.&GALE W. F. (2013): The co-evolutionary relationship between Energy Service Companies and the UK energy system: Implications for a low-carbon transition, Energy Policy, Vol. 61:1031-1045.
HENISZ, W. J.&ZELNER, B. A. (2005): Legitimacy, Interest Group Pressures, and Change in Emergent Institutions: The Case of Foreign Investors and Host Country Governments. Academy of Management Review, 30: 361–382.
INDEX (2013): Nem nyerészkedtek a lakosságon az áramcégek. (The electricity companies did not profiteer on households.) 2013.02.22. 23:41. Retrieved: December 30. 2014. from: http://index.hu/gazdasag/2013/02/22/nem_nyereszkedtek_a_lakossagon_az_aramcegek/ (in Hungarian)
LOCKETT, A., THOMSON, S. & MORGENSTERN, U. (2009): The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal. International Journal of Management Reviews, Volume 11 Issue 1: 9-28.
OSTERWALDER, A.&PIGNEUR,Y. (2010): Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers,and Challengers. Wiley Desktop Editions, Wiley, Hoboken.
PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY (2011): Nemzeti Energiastratégia 2030. (National Energy Strategy 2030). Magyar Közlöny, 2011/119 pp. 30210-30359. (in Hungarian)
PORTER M. E. (1980): Competitive Strategy.New York: The Free Press. PRIEM, R.L. &BUTLER, J.E. (2001): Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? The Academy of Management Review,26: 22-40.
RODRIGUES, S. B. &CHILD, J. (2003): Co-evolution in an Institutionalized Environment. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 40: 2137-2162.
RUMELT, R.P., SCHENDEL D.& TEECE D.J. (1991): Strategic Management and Economics. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Special Issue, Winter): 5-29.
SUHOMLINOVA, O. (2006): Toward a Model of Organizational Co-Evolution in Transition Economies. Journal of Management Studies,43, (7):1537–1558.
VINCE P. (2012): Árszabályozás és versenyhelyzet a magyarországi energiapiaci nyitás után. (Price regulation and competition after market opening of the Hungarian energy sector.)In.Valentiny P. –Kiss F.L. &Nagy Cs. I.(eds.): Verseny és szabályozás, 2011. (pp. 303–326). Budapest: MTA KRTK Közgazdaság-tudományi Intézet.(in Hungarian).
VOLBERDA, H. W. &LEWIN, A. Y. (2003): Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: from evolution to co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (8): 2105-2130.
WILSON J.& HYNES N.(2009): Co-evolution of firms and strategic alliances: theory and empirical evidence.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,76 (5): 620-628.
