Perceived Opportunities by Social Enterprises and their Effects on Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18096/TMP.2019.02.01Keywords:
business opportunities, inequality, social enterprises, social innovationAbstract
Social enterprises can play an important role in reducing inequality within a society and can also contribute to long-term economic development. Using a database based on the responses of 220 Hungarian social enterprises we first identify the business opportunities that they perceive. We conclude that social enterprises operating in different legal forms have different perceptions of their opportunities, and we speculate that this has an effect on their innovation activity as well. It is striking that – with the exception of social cooperatives – none of the Hungarian social enterprises see current or future social and/or market needs and demand as a major opportunity. This suggests that only social cooperatives have the incentive to focus their innovation efforts on social and market needs. Almost all social enterprises, on the other hand, have high expectation for European Union funds; the threat is that social innovation is driven by the targets set by the authorities allocating European funds, instead of the needs of the society.
References
ACEMOGLU, D & ROBINSON, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail. New York: Crown Publishing Group.
ACEMOGLU, D., JOHNSON, S. & ROBINSON, J. (2004): Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-run Growth. NBER Working Paper No. 10481, http://www.nber.org/papers/w10481, https://doi.org/10.3386/w10481
BRYNJOLFSSON, E. & MCAFEE, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
G. FEKETE, É.,BERECZK, Á.,KÁDÁRNÉ H., Á., KISS, J.,PÉTER, Z. - SIPOSNÉ N., E. – SZEGEDI, K. (2017): „Alapkutatás a társadalmi vállalkozások működéséről.” Zárótanulmány az OFA Országos Foglalkoztatási Közhasznú Nonprofit Kft. megbízásából, a GINOP - 5.1.2 - 15 - 2016 - 00001 „PiacTárs” kiemelt projekt keretében (Basic research on the operation of social enterprises – a study carried out on the request of and with the funding of OFA-GINOP). Miskolc: University of Miskolc.
KIS-ORLOCZKI, M. (2019): A körforgásos gazdaság és a társadalmi innováció kapcsolata (Relationship of the circular economy and social innovation). In: Kőszegi, I. (ed): Versenyképesség és innováció – III. gazdálkodási és menedzsment konferencia előadásai, Kecskemét, pp. 808-813.
LAZÁNYI, K. (2017). Innovation - the role of trust. Serbian Journal of Management, 12(2) pp. 331-344. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm12-12143
McCLOSKEY, D. N. (2016). Bourgeois Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MULGAN, G., TUCKER, S., ALI, R. & SANDERS, B. (2007). Social Innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, Oxford, United Kingdom.
NICHOLLS, A., SIMON, J. & GABRIEL, M. (2015). Introduction: Dimensions of Social Innovation. In: Nicholls, A., Simon, J. Gabriel, M. (eds.). New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
NOLAN, B., ROSER, M. & THEWISSEN, S. (2018): GDP per capita versus median household income: what gives rise to the divergence over time and how does this vary across OECD countries? The Review of Income and Wealth, https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12362
NORTH, D. C., WALLIS, J. J. & WEINGAST, B. R. (2008). Violence and the Rise of open-access orders, Journal of Democracy, 20(1), pp. 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0060
OECD (2010): SMEs, entrepreneurship and innovation. OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship.
PIKETTY, T. (2014): Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
WESTLEY, F. & ANTADZE, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), pp. 1–19.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
